Russel Wilson or Bob

I still think we will turn this around, I ain't worried about nuthin.

Russell Wilson was never on our radar as a starter. If we didn't draft RG3 we still weren't looking at Wilson until the 3rd at the absolutely earliest. But more like the 4th or 5th. If we didn't draft RG3 we probably would have taken Tannehill

Russell Wilson was never on our radar as a starter. If we didn't draft RG3 we still weren't looking at Wilson until the 3rd at the absolutely earliest. But more like the 4th or 5th. If we didn't draft RG3 we probably would have taken Tannehill

It is just a what if scenario.......I run them a ton at my work to figure out ROI's.

Using hindsight as of 9-25-13 the better bet would have been RW plus 3 first rounders and a 2nd rounder vs. RG sans the picks.

Griffin was far better than Wilson when healthy last year. He'll also be better when we look at their careers at the end.

You can't solely judge a QB's ability by the number of wins his team has, there are other factors such as defenses that can help a less-talented QB win more.

The Ravens proved this BOTH times they've won a Super Bowl.

Griffin was far better than Wilson when healthy last year. He'll also be better when we look at their careers at the end.

You can't solely judge a QB's ability by the number of wins his team has, there are other factors such as defenses that can help a less-talented QB win more.

The Ravens proved this BOTH times they've won a Super Bowl.
Russell Wilson has the highest qb rating since week 9 of last yr,higher than Peyton Manning,just something to think about

We needed a qb desperately so at the time I was very happy with getting RG3.Theres no way to know if Wilson would have played as well with us as he has in seattle,so many different factors involved.

If you knew Wilson would have played as well with us has he has for seattle then its a no brainer,you draft him and keep your draft picks that we desperately needed to overcome the cap penalty.

Add on top of that 2 knee surgeries for RG3 in 4 yrs and people are screaming "he needs to run more!!" I just do not see a healthy career in his future
I hate to say it but I think RG3 is gonna be one of those guys we look back at and say "what if"

We needed a qb desperately so at the time I was very happy with getting RG3.Theres no way to know if Wilson would have played as well with us as he has in seattle,so many different factors involved.

If you knew Wilson would have played as well with us has he has for seattle then its a no brainer,you draft him and keep your draft picks that we desperately needed to overcome the cap penalty.

Add on top of that 2 knee surgeries for RG3 in 4 yrs and people are screaming "he needs to run more!!" I just do not see a healthy career in his future
I hate to say it but I think RG3 is gonna be one of those guys we look back at and say "what if"

I hate to say it too but I think you are right. They will use his pre-injury rookie season as the bench mark that he will never reach again. Hopefully we are wrong.

Russell Wilson has the highest qb rating since week 9 of last yr,higher than Peyton Manning,just something to think about

This was posted in another thread. RW is starting to look pretty good especially if we had gotten to keep our 3 first round.

IDK 3 first round picks and RW vs. just RGIII. Looks like SEA has won so far.

They've won only because RW has not had a major knee injury. If RG3 was sucking it up without the injury, then yes they would've "won".

You cant just say anybody won after a year. You gotta look at the career and circumstances. But Russel Wilson is proven now. No question. RG3 is proven. But the challenges are different for both. Right now, if Seattle is not in the superbowl, its a failure. flat out failure. If RG3 doesnt play all 16 games or re injuries a knee, its a failure.

i know, and yes you want the better QB regardless of the draft picks. Even put Luck in the equation...ceiling is still higher with RG3 over both Luck and Wilson.

objectively i think its luck over rg3 at this point in time.