Review the Redskins Personnel Moves from 2005-2009

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop

Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Review the Redskins Personnel Moves from 2005-2009

User Name Remember Me?

Password

Register Forum Rules FAQ Calendar

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion

Go to Page...

Review the Redskins Personnel Moves from 2005-2009

Locker Room Main Forum

Thread Tools Display Modes

Prev Next

10-15-2009, 05:52 PM #14

BaltimoreSkins

Pro Bowl

Join Date: Jan 2008

Location: Parkton, MD

Posts: 5,788

Re: Review the Redskins Personnel Moves from 2005-2009

Lack of drafting O-line def, but overall during that time span I don't feel like it was a good track record of drafting. Looking at I'd give a C/C+ at best. I'm curious at how the other clubs in the division would rate over the same five year span.

BaltimoreSkins

View Public Profile

Find More Posts by BaltimoreSkins

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Tools

Show Printable Version

Display Modes

Switch to Linear Mode

Switch to Hybrid Mode

Threaded Mode

Posting Rules

You may not post new threads

You may not post replies

You may not post attachments

You may not edit your posts

BB code is On

Smilies are On

[IMG] code is On

HTML code is Off

Forum Rules

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Contact Us - Commanders Post at The Warpath - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.

Page generated in 1.20200 seconds with 11 queries

10-15-2009, 05:52 PM	#14
BaltimoreSkins Pro Bowl Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Parkton, MD Posts: 5,788	Re: Review the Redskins Personnel Moves from 2005-2009 Lack of drafting O-line def, but overall during that time span I don't feel like it was a good track record of drafting. Looking at I'd give a C/C+ at best. I'm curious at how the other clubs in the division would rate over the same five year span.