Give Props to Brunell

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

Big C
11-06-2006, 04:25 PM
brunell was efficient once again for us, pretty solid game aside from the botched snap, but the win is what really matters. we are limiting turnovers, but not creating them

SmootSmack
11-06-2006, 04:26 PM
I think if you're going to "bash" him for near INTs and say we almost lost the game you have to also say our receivers have dropped passes this season and we've almost won games. For example, while it wasn't necessarily a dropped pass, Brunell's endzone pass to Moss against the Vikings was right on the money. A great play by Sharper prevented a TD and probably a win. But it's part of the game. It's a game of inches as they say

rotahe39
11-06-2006, 04:27 PM
I'm just glad they were throwing the ball over the middle and down the field....on third and long he actually threw it past the first down marker unlike the last game when it be third and long and he dump it off for 2 yards..

RedskinRat
11-06-2006, 04:27 PM
Here's why I don't think you can let it just be a mindless celebration: Brunell did not play well. It sets the cause back if the cause is a Super Bowl run. I can't blindly wave the flag and Rah-Rah and unless the rules of the forum have changed I believe that we're free to dissent?

I don't enjoy being called stupid by someone who's displaying their own stupidity by making a statement with no facts to back it up.

Watch the film, see what Brunell did, come back and defend what you saw as 'excellent' or 'unbelieveable'. I'll enjoy the debate.

hesscl34
11-06-2006, 04:30 PM
If you think I'm "stupid" enough to get pulled into this mudslinging contest, think again.

RedskinRat
11-06-2006, 04:34 PM
If you think I'm "stupid" enough to get pulled into this mudslinging contest, think again.

I'm stating facts.

hesscl34
11-06-2006, 04:35 PM
Fact: We Won!

illdefined
11-06-2006, 04:42 PM
Fact: We Won!

devil's advocate: so if Novak missed the 2nd kick and we lost, Brunell played lousy? one point doesn't necessarily make the other true.

RedskinRat
11-06-2006, 04:48 PM
Fact: We Won!

Not something I'm arguing about.

People are posting like Brunell was dominant. He was barely adequate. While he stays as the starting QB we have to put up with mediocre/sub-par QB play and that's the kind of attitude that prolonges the inevitable.

Watch the game again and tell me what you think.

hesscl34
11-06-2006, 04:50 PM
POINT is that Brunell is our QB and will remain so the remainder of the year, so why do we have to talk about this week in and week out. He's not going anywhere, and to those of us that like enjoying a WIN, it gets old listening to the same crap over and over and over again from the bashers.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum