Offensive line depth (R. Thomas' injury)

Why wouldn't the Redskins re-sign Boston Pete at this point?

Only way would be as a backup.

Why wouldn't the Redskins re-sign Boston Pete at this point?

How could it hurt? Give Reinhart a shot but having a back-up plan is never a bad idea.

Who;s your inactive then to make room on the active roster for him?

Who;s your inactive then to make room on the active roster for him?

Have they filled the active spot yet?

I would inactive Mason. He doesn't add anything to what Portis and Betts bring to the table.

Who;s your inactive then to make room on the active roster for him?

I agree. Reinhardt starts with Montgomery backing him up. Do you sign Kendall just to have him sit inactive? We actually have homegrown talent, lets use it.

Have they filled the active spot yet?

I would inactive Mason. He doesn't add anything to what Portis and Betts bring to the table.

Uh oh... you just opened up a whole other can of crazy - why'd you have to go and stir that pot.

Once Thomas goes on IR they still need to fill his roster spot. I don't care if Kendall is inactive, he's just insurance.

Have they filled the active spot yet?

I would inactive Mason. He doesn't add anything to what Portis and Betts bring to the table.

But he can play teams, particularly on a day like Sunday when Smoot and Barnes (two other guys who play teams) were both inactive. Barnes may have been week 1 as well (can't remember)

Kendall won't be playing teams

Anyone else really worried that a decision still hasnt been made?

Here is our annual Offensive Line rant, just coming a bit early this year.

http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/09/is-randy-thomas-the-outer-bands-of-a-bad-storm-coming.html (http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/09/is-randy-thomas-the-outer-bands-of-a-bad-storm-coming.html)

Anyone else really worried that a decision still hasnt been made?

It has. Chad Rhinehart is starting.