2011 NFL Draft

Kaepernick at #10 anyone?

Colin Kaepernick may be making Cutler-like climb | ProFootballTalk (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/27/colin-kaepernick-may-be-making-cutler-like-climb/)

I guess we are going to wind up having to trade up back into the first round to get Kaepernick. He won't go top 10 though IMO. I can see him as a mid to late first round after it all settles. These draft gurus get high on someone then low on them. They go up and down the draft boards like a horse on a merry-go-round. I would love to get this kid.

Or with all the talk about teams rumored to be wanting to trade up, trade down and use the mid to late round 1st on him. Then we have a lot more ammo to go get other holes to fill. I'm excited for the draft even if owners and players can't get their heads out their @$$es.

KaepKrusader, what have you seen or heard about this kid that made you change your mind. For the past couple of months you made no apologies about Miller then Hudson with the second rd.

Bradshaw is not the type of QB you want to point to as to why the Wonderlic doesn't mater. If anything his career numbers (http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BradTe00.htm) validate the importance of the Wonderlic.

jesus, no s. i never knew his numbers were that bad, his completion percentage is a joke..

jesus, no s. i never knew his numbers were that bad, his completion percentage is a joke..

Does that say anything about the relationship of "the numbers" and winning?

Does that say anything about the relationship of "the numbers" and winning?

Bradshaw isn't a very good case study.

That Pittsburgh team had nine players on it who now have a bust in Canton.

Sage Rosenfels or Gus Frerotte would most likely have won multiple rings leading that dynasty of talent.

I think at best Kaepernick is a low first rounder, but probably more likely high to mid 2nd round. Still, all it takes is one...

Bradshaw isn't a very good case study.

That Pittsburgh team had nine players on it who now have a bust in Canton.

Sage Rosenfels or Gus Frerotte would most likely have won multiple rings leading that dynasty of talent.

If Bradshaw had only done it once......perhaps
It will be difficult to craft an argument against 8 AFC Central titles and 4 Superbowls.

Does that say anything about the relationship of "the numbers" and winning?How could you pass up the chance for a great Charlie Sheen reference?

Terry Bradshaw stats?

Duh WINNING! http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTPfZ8NYTbEDuvOC2jkorjMA9lpO7_dS Pudcix2uYNVUGQIqf-Y

30gut, you've posted some of the most comprehensive QB stats here. What is your take on Kaepernick? I thought he looked good at the Sr. Bowl, but honestly that is the only time I've seen him play.