trump Inpeachment...............

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54

mooby
01-09-2020, 05:42 PM
Yeah NBC 4 in DC said that three different US agencies confirm it was either one or two rockets ,damn!

Somebody def. fucked up on that one. Whoever authorized the launch will probably be publicly scapegoated.

httr198020
01-09-2020, 09:35 PM
It did work and it was working. Our own intelligence agency said it was working. Even the Republicans that were against it were wary of pulling out of the treaty. You keep saying the past 8 months Iran has been doing X and Y. NO shit sherlock. That's right when President Dumbass pulled out of the treaty. Iran is acting the way they're acting because dickless just wants to undo Obama's legacy. He didn't care the repercussions of it. He just wanted to claim it was a bad deal (much like he did NAFTA) not really knowing shit about it. Hell, in 2015, the idiot didn't even know who that general he killed was.

Starts at the 8min mark.

OEiwoY_6ll8
How was it working when they were still developing a nuke? It is sad how ignorant people are nowadays.

NC_Skins
01-09-2020, 10:37 PM
How was it working when they were still developing a nuke? It is sad how ignorant people are nowadays.

They weren't. To say they were is a huge lie and bullshit.

https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-04/news/iaea-says-iran-abiding-nuclear-deal

The IAEA quarterly report on Iran’s nuclear program, released publicly just days after Amano’s statement, contains additional details demonstrating that Iran is abiding by the deal’s terms. It notes that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium is below the 300-kilogram cap set by the JCPOA and that Iran has not enriched uranium above the limit of 3.67 percent uranium-235, far below the 90 percent level considered useful for weapons purposes.

The report notes that the agency has had access to “all the sites and locations in Iran which it needed to visit.”


From our own military command:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-strategic-command-chief-iran-abiding-by-nuclear-deal

Iran is abiding by the terms of the historic nuclear agreement reached under President Obama, the head of U.S. Strategic Command said on Wednesday. “The facts are that Iran is operating under the agreements the we signed up for under the [deal],” Gen. John Hyten said at an event at the Hudson Institute


Now, what they were doing is updating their research on ballistic missiles. That isn't part of the nuclear deal though.

Chico23231
01-10-2020, 08:57 AM
NC, go back to my original post where twice out of a timeline I pointed out issues of ballistic missiles which were in violation of un res and the discovery Iran was researching for the development of advanced centrifuges technology which would allow for them to enrich faster in to build a nuclear weapon once the provisions this short term deal was over.

The Iranians were only out of compliance a couple times in the agreement which they quickly came back within guidelines of holding heavy water and other things...so yes, from the perimeters of the deal, Iran was abiding by it.

That's not the argument...the argument is the deal was bad, the cash we gave them combined with sanctions lifted was used to by arms, develop there military and then used to fund violent proxy wars in Yemen, Isreal, and Saudi Arabia. Also the Sunset clauses in research and development put Iran in position to restart their Nuclear plan in the future.

It just wasn't tough enough and like Ive said, its been proven since the deal has been in place. Iran has ramped up the violence in the region.

Please don't act like Iran is some good actor in the Middle East, they are not. The deal allowed them to become more violent and even expand operations.

We disagree on how things should be and have been handled in the past..i get it.

Chico23231
01-10-2020, 09:04 AM
Back down??? The world was on their side in this one ,the US came out looking like an ass and the Ukraine passenger plane conspiracy has already been debunked . Look no one says that General was a Saint or didn't deserve what happen to him , we get it but if you don't think the US Military could have handled it differently , you're nuts. Trump wants to stand up and get his Bin Laden moment, ........that is all this was, an all about trump moment.

This is a bad look G1. Can you post who claimed these were conspiracy theories? My guess is the mainstream media who has been lying about this shit from day 1. Chalk this one up as Chico was right again.

Is MSNBC still running the report that 30 US troops were killed in the Iran strike? They were running fucking Iran propaganda...pathetic!

Also, bravo to NBC reporters, CBS and the AP trying to assign blame to Trump over the incompetence of the Iranian army. They were pushing the "crossfire" conspiracy theory I guess? There was never any crossfire folks...its a lie. This is a tragic consequence of Iranian aggression and pure incompetence. Our military could turn Iran into a sheet of glass if we wanted.

Im hoping after this down plane the US and Mideast should come together and realize perpetual aggression just leads to more heartbreak. Iran should call there proxies home and stop attacking and plodding a aggression in sovereign nations throughout the middle east.

Schneed10
01-10-2020, 09:22 AM
This needs to be understood: the difference between what the Iranian government forces their people to say and do vs how those citizens actually feel. Everyone in this thread who is commenting needs to understand this as fundamental context, or you really can't form an educated opinion that passes as relevant or worth discussing.

1C888mSyD7s

httr198020
01-10-2020, 10:38 AM
They weren't. To say they were is a huge lie and bullshit.

https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2019-04/news/iaea-says-iran-abiding-nuclear-deal




From our own military command:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/us-strategic-command-chief-iran-abiding-by-nuclear-deal




Now, what they were doing is updating their research on ballistic missiles. That isn't part of the nuclear deal though. I don't think it was a lie. The Iranians have every intention on getting their hands on a nuclear missile. The Iran deal was nothing more than a mirage to give the illusion of a political win for Barack Obama. What sad is that leftists in this country will believe anything that comes out of the left no matter how irrational it might be. This is the problem I have with the Iran deal. First, the UN has to give Iran 23 day notice before they can perform a "random" inspection. That's like telling someone who's suspected of dealing drugs you're going to give them a few days notice before getting a search warrant. Would that make any sense to you? Second, the UN is not even allowed to inspect all of Iran's nuclear facilities. How in the hell does that make sense? On top of that Barack Obama gives them 150 billion dollars? What is so bad is that even after the deal Iran is still funding terrorist and waging proxy wars all across the Middle East. Not only that they have been firing at US ships throughout the Obama presidency. The deal hasn't stopped them from doing any of these things what's to stop them from developing a nuke immediately after the Iran deal expires? Donald Trump wants real random expectations, he wants access to all of their facilities, and he wants a permanent deal. I totally agree with him on that..

BaltimoreSkins
01-10-2020, 11:37 AM
A 23 day warning is a one second warning with radioactive half-life there is zilch they could do to cover up which is why they got busted in one of the inspections. You can’t hide radioactive decay in the tens of thousands to millions of years on the half-life.

BaltimoreSkins
01-10-2020, 12:10 PM
This needs to be understood: the difference between what the Iranian government forces their people to say and do vs how those citizens actually feel. Everyone in this thread who is commenting needs to understand this as fundamental context, or you really can't form an educated opinion that passes as relevant or worth discussing.

1C888mSyD7s

Every person I know that is Iranian has similar view points I think Mooby had posted a few pages back about the disconnect between the state of Iran and the people in terms of what each wants. It is important to know and understand the ramifications of our actions on actual people.

Chico23231
01-10-2020, 12:31 PM
This needs to be understood: the difference between what the Iranian government forces their people to say and do vs how those citizens actually feel. Everyone in this thread who is commenting needs to understand this as fundamental context, or you really can't form an educated opinion that passes as relevant or worth discussing.

1C888mSyD7s

yes...this made the rounds on social media the other day. Its worth watching.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum