MTK
09-13-2005, 03:26 PM
Joe Gibbs knows more about football than I could ever learn in 5 lifetimes, but
There shouldn't be a but.
You summed it up perfectly, thanks.
There shouldn't be a but.
You summed it up perfectly, thanks.
Brunell StartingMTK 09-13-2005, 03:26 PM Joe Gibbs knows more about football than I could ever learn in 5 lifetimes, but There shouldn't be a but. You summed it up perfectly, thanks. offiss 09-13-2005, 03:28 PM i have one question, i'm not getting into the middle of this or anything, but here goes. For all you Ramsey lovers out there, please answer this: If, and if, we beat Dallas this Monday Night what will you think about the situation between Ramsey and Brunell? Will you still think Ramsey got shafted, or will you say Brunell is the better option? Absolutly! Just because we beat Dallas with Brunell doesn't mean we wouldn't have with Ramsey, or more convincingly with Ramsey as well, the problem with that question is this, it's predicated on Brunell actually beating Dallas. So I will ask this question for all the Brunell/ Gibbs lovers out there, if Dallas beats us monday night will you say Ramsey got the short end of the stick on this one? And will further it 1 more, if Brunell turns the ball over in the first quarter will you call for an immediate QB change? 12thMan 09-13-2005, 03:28 PM i have one question, i'm not getting into the middle of this or anything, but here goes. For all you Ramsey lovers out there, please answer this: If, and if, we beat Dallas this Monday Night what will you think about the situation between Ramsey and Brunell? Will you still think Ramsey got shafted, or will you say Brunell is the better option? Well, first of all that's a big if. Secondly, no Redskin fan in their right mind would be unhappy under any circumstances with a win over Dallas. Basically, it boils down to this. The people that want Brunell to start aren't really endorsing Brunell as much as they aren't that confident in Ramsey's ability to be the team's undisputed starting QB and get tangible results. I think that's one side of it. The people that want Ramsey, (not putting words in anyone's mouth, just the general feeling I've gotten from reading and posting myself) feel it's more about what "Gibbs said he would do", and giving Patrick the same shot as he gave Brunell. Ramsey supporters feel that it's more of a loyalty issue at stake here. Both sides have their merits, but at the end of the day we really aren't Ramsey or Brunell fans, we really Redskins fans! illdefined 09-13-2005, 03:38 PM i have one question, i'm not getting into the middle of this or anything, but here goes. For all you Ramsey lovers out there, please answer this: If, and if, we beat Dallas this Monday Night what will you think about the situation between Ramsey and Brunell? Will you still think Ramsey got shafted, or will you say Brunell is the better option? Brunell winning that game with an improved offense will *not* prove to me that Ramsey couldn't do the same. handicapped preseason and the first 19 minutes of the season just wasn't enough. RedskinRat 09-13-2005, 03:39 PM Please explain 'handicapped preseason'? Wasn't Ramsey working with the Starters? illdefined 09-13-2005, 03:44 PM Please explain 'handicapped preseason'? Wasn't Ramsey working with the Starters? Portis barely played the entire preseason. Cooley wasn't in at all for a couple games. (the one he was in he got a Ramsey TD though). and he certainly wasn't playing with the full playbook. same with the opponent's defense, everyone was holding back and trying things out, it's NO MEASURE compared the regular season Ramsey *did* play and outscored Brunell in. RedskinRat 09-13-2005, 03:46 PM I'm also including the team prep work. Ramsey was training and playing with the firts stringers all training camp and pre-season. There has to be more to Ramsey's percieved failure than what the fans are seeing. illdefined 09-13-2005, 03:49 PM I'm also including the team prep work. Ramsey was training and playing with the firts stringers all training camp and pre-season. There has to be more to Ramsey's percieved failure than what the fans are seeing. playing in shorts against guys who really don't want to hurt you still can't compare to the regular season that *did* happen. happened just last year in fact. PSUSkinsFan21 09-13-2005, 05:03 PM There shouldn't be a but. You summed it up perfectly, thanks. Hey, I hope you're right. And I've been (and will continue to be) a huge Gibbs supporter on this site. I'm just puzzled by this. I actually thought Ramsey started looking pretty good up until the clothesline hit???? Maybe I just had on rose-colored glasses, but I felt like we'd be fine with Ramsey at the helm this year. Brunell scares the heck out of me based on what I saw last year........hopefully he's A LOT better this year. mattdouthat 09-13-2005, 06:53 PM Brunell is one of the most accurate passers in NFL history he was the main reason Jacksonville was any good for years. From what I saw in preseason he is moving better and delivering good balls. This leads me to believe that his injury was affecting him. He might not be as mobile as he once was but he is smarter and will not throw the picks Ramsey seems prone too. Gibbs got him for a reason he believes he is best fit for offense unfortunatly with his injury and not having all the Gibbs guys in there yet was tough. Had alot of Spurrier guys leave and Gibbs brought in his guys this offseason. So I say give the man who has brought us three super bowls run the team until proved otherwise I trust he knows what he is doing. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum