Lotus
08-28-2009, 11:48 AM
It if were any other team, they would have used some common sense and the 60-yard long ego display would have never been installed...like the Colts just did.
Thank you. Spot on.
Thank you. Spot on.
Problem w/ Cowboys giant screen.Lotus 08-28-2009, 11:48 AM It if were any other team, they would have used some common sense and the 60-yard long ego display would have never been installed...like the Colts just did. Thank you. Spot on. KLHJ2 08-28-2009, 11:48 AM I'm waiting for the do-over after a great punt with hangtime late in the 4th quarter of a close game hits Jerry's Used Car Sale Commercial playing on the screen...then the do-over is BLOCKED! Will be sweeter if the Cowboys are the victims. :D That is what I want to see. Ruhskins 08-28-2009, 11:49 AM Does New England play the Cowpukes at Dallas? Maybe Darth Hoody will complain about this and Goodell will have JJ take this down. Skinny Tee 08-28-2009, 11:53 AM I'm waiting for the do-over after a great punt with hangtime late in the 4th quarter of a close game hits Jerry's Used Car Sale Commercial playing on the screen...then the do-over is BLOCKED! Will be sweeter if the Cowboys are the victims. :D What about do-overs for the gunners? F-that, I'd be pissed...I'd imagine that would affect the next punt return outcome too if the gunners are getting worn down running all the way down the field for just a "do-over" Daseal 08-28-2009, 11:53 AM Did I misread the rule or does the playclock stay where it was when the snap occurred? What then happens if you're trying to run down the clock before a punt, snap it at 2 -- then the punt hits the screen? You have 2 seconds to get the snap off once the ball is reset? I don't like that part of it. I also feel this is blown out of proportion. Jerry didn't really get his way, but the NFL realized "Oh shit, this is our fault. We'll have to pay to move this behemoth." If this becomes a consistent problem, something will have to give, but Im willing to bet these rules stay in place. I don't like the play clock one. At least add 5 seconds to the clock so that they have time to get a snap off. Monkeydad 08-28-2009, 12:02 PM Did I misread the rule or does the playclock stay where it was when the snap occurred? What then happens if you're trying to run down the clock before a punt, snap it at 2 -- then the punt hits the screen? You have 2 seconds to get the snap off once the ball is reset? I don't like that part of it. I also feel this is blown out of proportion. Jerry didn't really get his way, but the NFL realized "Oh shit, this is our fault. We'll have to pay to move this behemoth." If this becomes a consistent problem, something will have to give, but Im willing to bet these rules stay in place. I don't like the play clock one. At least add 5 seconds to the clock so that they have time to get a snap off. I do not think it's the league's fault, even if the regulations say 85 feet. If you're building something, you need to make sure it is done properly. Building regulations are often set low in any type of construction, they're a minimum recommendation. If every builder followed every regulation exactly with no variance from the codes set up by people who really aren't qualified to do so...a lot of buildings would be useless, unfit to serve their purpose and so on. He spent $1.2 BILLION and could not make sure the largest component being installed in the stadium is being done properly? He couldn't (out of arrogance) consult someone who just completed a new stadium and found a flaw with the league regulation...then worked around it successfully? I don't care if the league regulation says 25 feet or 2 miles...it's the builder's (or in this case, the man with the checkbook) responsibility that the facilities meet their intended needs for use...a punt-blocking TV screen does not. I'd be ripping Snyder too if he did something this idiotic than acted like a pompous ass afterwards...luckily, our owner actually learns from experience and doesn't interfere with his team the way Jones or Al Davis does. irish 08-28-2009, 12:07 PM I do not think it's the league's fault, even if the regulations say 85 feet. If you're building something, you need to make sure it is done properly. Building regulations are often set low in any type of construction, they're a minimum recommendation. If every builder followed every regulation exactly with no variance from the codes set up by people who really aren't qualified to do so...a lot of buildings would be useless, unfit to serve their purpose and so on. He spent $1.2 BILLION and could not make sure the largest component being installed in the stadium is being done properly? He couldn't (out of arrogance) consult someone who just completed a new stadium and found a flaw with the league regulation...then worked around it successfully? I don't care if the league regulation says 25 feet or 2 miles...it's the builder's (or in this case, the man with the checkbook) responsibility that the facilities meet their intended needs for use...a punt-blocking TV screen does not. I'd be ripping Snyder too if he did something this idiotic than acted like a pompous ass afterwards...luckily, our owner actually learns from experience and doesn't interfere with his team the way Jones or Al Davis does. It was installed properly and the installation exceeded the minimum requirement. I'm not sure the burden is on Jerry to run down every new stadium owner and ask what issues they have had. If the burden lies anywhere it would be with the architect or the NFL. Daseal 08-28-2009, 12:12 PM Buster, lets say you're building a house. In your neighborhood no house can be above 60 feet (I really have no clue how tall houses are...). Your house comes in at 58 feet, and they tell you no -- it must be lower. Are you going to suck it up and say fine, then pocket the cost of getting your house down to 55 feet? I'm guessing not. Rules and regulations are in place and you guy by them. Fact is, he followed all NFL regulations and I don't forsee this being a big issue. The league also has to approve the stadium and its specifics, do they not? However you swing it, the league is absolutely responsible for the scoreboard being too low. Don't get me wrong, I hate the Cowboys as much as everyone else here. But I truly believe Jerry tried his best to make this stadium as nice as possible for his fans. A big HD jumbotron is part of that package. Monkeydad 08-28-2009, 12:12 PM It was installed properly and the installation exceeded the minimum requirement. I'm not sure the burden is on Jerry to run down every new stadium owner and ask what issues they have had. If the burden lies anywhere it would be with the architect or the NFL. You don't believe Jerry would allow architects, installers, or ANYONE else actually make any decisions and changes to his monument, do you? It's his project, it's his responsibility to make sure it is right...no matter what the regulations SUGGEST. The regulation authors never envisioned a screen that was 60 yards long and large enough to block the view of the top half of the stadium. He was putting something of that magnitude in for the first time, you'd think he would make sure it would actually work for playing a football game under it and fit in the space. Unfortunately, his pocketbook and ego are both larger than his brain. 53Fan 08-28-2009, 12:13 PM Again I say, that after seeing the Campbell and the Redskins starting offense in the first 2 preseason games, I can certainly understand your concerns over punting. This doesn't have anything to do with the Redskins. We kicked your ass at home last year and I expect we'll do it again. This is all about having a stadium that could affect the outcome and/or pace of a game. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum