Who should we go for in Free Agency?


Kope
03-03-2015, 06:16 PM
Noble?

CRedskinsRule
03-03-2015, 09:57 PM
Here Keim breaks down Ricky Jean-Francois contract:

Ricky Jean Francois' contract breakdown with Washington Redskins - ESPN (http://espn.go.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/15619/ricky-jean-francois-contract-breakdown)

very affordable

this is what BA is good at. No we didn't win more with him (ref your sig) but we did navigate the salary cap boondoggle that VC had left the team.

I wish we could have had a good GM and a good contract guy and a good HC at the same time, but maybe we have 2, or even 3 now... Hopefully they all are on the same page.

Lotus
03-03-2015, 10:48 PM
this is what BA is good at. No we didn't win more with him (ref your sig) but we did navigate the salary cap boondoggle that VC had left the team.

I wish we could have had a good GM and a good contract guy and a good HC at the same time, but maybe we have 2, or even 3 now... Hopefully they all are on the same page.

What you say about Bruce is true. I've never said that Bruce is terrible at everything.

But what's the point of being more cap-friendly if we lose more?

Irrefutable
03-04-2015, 05:14 AM
per Rich Tandler: Redskins will NOT sign Suh, or Iupati

Need to Know: Five free agents who won’t become Redskins | Rich Tandler's Real Redskins (http://realredskins.com/2015/03/04/need-to-know-five-free-agents-who-wont-become-redskins/)

CRedskinsRule
03-04-2015, 07:11 AM
What you say about Bruce is true. I've never said that Bruce is terrible at everything.

But what's the point of being more cap-friendly if we lose more?
I guess the point iis that if we get a guy that knows talent and pair him with a strong contract/cap guy then we should be putting the team together the right way.

KI Skins Fan
03-04-2015, 07:27 AM
What you say about Bruce is true. I've never said that Bruce is terrible at everything.

But what's the point of being more cap-friendly if we lose more?

There is no point to comparing the W/L records of Bruce and Vinny. because both of their records were unacceptable. The difference between the two executives is that Bruce does some things well whereas Vinny was completely incompetent as Redskins GM.

For example, I thought that Bruce put a good plan in place for FA last year which he executed well, although the personnel choices could have been better. That plan put us in a position to sign DJax to a bargain contract late in FA. Vinny signed a fat, lazy, selfish DL with a bad reputation to a $100MM FA contract.

Now that we have a true personnel man in place as GM, I'm hoping that Bruce will prove to be a valuable resource in rebuilding the Redskins.

skinsfan69
03-04-2015, 08:55 AM
Bruce should stay on the business side, do PR, do charity ( "we're winning off the field!") and keep running the alumni stuff. After watching his press conference at the end of the year, he came across as borderline incompetent.

skinsguy
03-04-2015, 12:18 PM
per Rich Tandler: Redskins will NOT sign Suh, or Iupati

Need to Know: Five free agents who won’t become Redskins | Rich Tandler's Real Redskins (http://realredskins.com/2015/03/04/need-to-know-five-free-agents-who-wont-become-redskins/)

He's looking to get paid! In the past, Vinny would have signed him! Thank God those days are over.

over the mountain
03-04-2015, 12:46 PM
Noble?

yes thank you Cope.

KI Skins Fan
03-04-2015, 12:51 PM
What ever happened to all of the leaks at Redskins Park? Now that Scot M. has taken over personnel, the media folks don't seem to have a clue what the Skins might be doing in Free Agency or the draft.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum