Who should we go for in Free Agency?Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
[45]
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
EARTHQUAKE2689 03-11-2015, 08:30 AM Only way I pass is if we can trade down Even if we can't, I just don't think Mariota is that good. Also would you rather have Antonio Cromartie or Browner as a stop gap CB?? Skinsfanatic 03-11-2015, 08:30 AM I would pass on him, and Browner scheduled to visit us after he leaves New Orleans So, we sign Knighton, Cox, and Browner today and call it a successful free agency. Move Hall to Safety and draft another safety to go with him (in round 3 or later). Draft Scherff (Iowa) Rd. 1 and Erving (FSU) Rd. 2. skinsfaninok 03-11-2015, 08:35 AM Rather have browner he's big and physical Lotus 03-11-2015, 09:12 AM Report: Redskins won't pass on Marcus Mariota (http://was.247sports.com/Bolt/Report-Redskins-wont-pass-on-Marcus-Mariota-36114224) Clayton is just being brainless. He claims that the Bradford trade takes away all the Eagles trade-up ammo. But: 1) Bradford is part of the ammo! 2) The #2 pick the Eagles surrender is for NEXT year. 3) The Eagles still have the #20 pick and other picks besides. 4) The Eagles could also add players in a trade with, say, the Titans, like the Jets did to move up and take Sanchize. Chico23231 03-11-2015, 09:15 AM Still think Titans will take Mariota Ruhskins 03-11-2015, 09:19 AM So back to Free Agency... Apparently we're hosting Knighton, Cox, and Browner. I think Knighton and Cox would be great picks ups. A line with Hatcher, Knighton, and Paea would be ridiculous. Lotus 03-11-2015, 09:20 AM If I were the Titans, I'd take Bradford over Mariota and not think twice, especially since they'll get more than Bradford in the trade. But that's just me. EARTHQUAKE2689 03-11-2015, 09:57 AM So, we sign Knighton, Cox, and Browner today and call it a successful free agency. Move Hall to Safety and draft another safety to go with him (in round 3 or later). Draft Scherff (Iowa) Rd. 1 and Erving (FSU) Rd. 2. If we sign those 3, I might move Hall to unemployed, and I wouldn't take Schreff at 5, Erving I like. SFREDSKIN 03-11-2015, 09:58 AM Rather have Culliver than Cox, both solid corners with baggage. Ruhskins 03-11-2015, 10:03 AM If we sign those 3, I might move Hall to unemployed, and I wouldn't take Schreff at 5, Erving I like. I doubt we sign both Cox and Browner, with the need we have for a Free Safety. Unless one of them decides to play safety. | |
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum