Looking at the draft.

I like Payne because he can get bigger, he hasn't maxed out his frame yet.

I’ve been thinking about this lately, Payne in the first, Sony Michel in the 2nd. Thoughts?

I’d rather have Jones from USC...but Michel is good.

I think neither there at our pick in the second.

Payne or Vea in the 1st and either Jones, Michel, or Penny in the 2nd. If there isn't a trade down this should be the most likely plausible scenario inside Redskins Park too.

We need an elite guard or a menace to go along w/ Allen. I would never ever draft RB's in the 1st 2 rounds. I would treat backs just like the Patriots do. Never pay them big money cause they're interchangeable for the most part. Payne would be good but I would pass on Michel in the 2nd.

https://youtu.be/_stSvqc4gMk

Hmmm...interesting breakdown of Isaiah Oliver, a CB I haven't heard a lot of hype about. Would be an interesting pick if he falls somewhere we can get him line the 4th maybe?

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

We need an elite guard or a menace to go along w/ Allen. I would never ever draft RB's in the 1st 2 rounds. I would treat backs just like the Patriots do. Never pay them big money cause they're interchangeable for the most part. Payne would be good but I would pass on Michel in the 2nd.

If we had s 3rd rounder, I'd say RB or LG in the 2nd and the other position in the 3rd. But I think its easier to find a starting guard than starting back 4th round or later. I want a stud RB. I miss Portis.

If we had s 3rd rounder, I'd say RB or LG in the 2nd and the other position in the 3rd. But I think its easier to find a starting guard than starting back 4th round or later. I want a stud RB. I miss Portis. This is kind of my thinking too. I'm generally very much a proponent of don't need to draft a RB early, but it's clearly a big need and we keep whiffing on mid round backs. Maybe it's reactionary, but there are just so many really talented guys in the early rounds this year that it would feel disappointing to Get a guy with a limited ceiling in the 4th. The ideal scenario is a trade back that allows us to get both in the 2nd-3rd but barring that I trend to agree with you.

Ultimately though it's going to come down to how the board plays out on draft day. If there's an early run on RBs we may miss out on the top tier guys in the 2nd and it would make sense to wait until the 4th if you have a big cluster of guys around the same talent on the board, and the same thing goes for Guard. Just gotta hope that both positions don't have an early run.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

We need an elite guard or a menace to go along w/ Allen. I would never ever draft RB's in the 1st 2 rounds. I would treat backs just like the Patriots do. Never pay them big money cause they're interchangeable for the most part. Payne would be good but I would pass on Michel in the 2nd.That elite guard is Nelson and no chance he falls to 13.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk

Yeah need to find a RB. Have not had a franchise RB albeit briefly that of Alfred Morris.

If we had s 3rd rounder, I'd say RB or LG in the 2nd and the other position in the 3rd. But I think its easier to find a starting guard than starting back 4th round or later. I want a stud RB. I miss Portis.

Clinton Portis was drafted in the second round. Not exactly top half of the first round. Not exactly franchise player consideration before or during 2002 draft.
We need a killer guard before a top RB. Fix the lines first.