|
|
Defensewins 03-30-2018, 01:34 PM This. Redskins board may line up Guice 10th overall and G Wynn at 15. That's really not outlandish to think.
REMEMBER...the folks making the obvious reach will be for the QBs Rosen, Jackson, Allen and Mayfield...which will push talent back to everyone in the teens. These are reaches...
That is exactly right. This year several QB starved teams will reach in the top 10 for Qb. The real talent will drop to us like last year.
Just fix our O-line and Defense and call it a day.
LeGarrette Blount Undrafted Free Agent and Jay Ajai 5th round pick combined for 150 yards rushing in the Super Bowl and averaged 6.3 yards a carry.
Because the O-line in front of them kicked ass. The Eagles were on their second string left tackle and 2nd string QB. When you have a physical offensive line and defense you do not need top of the draft QB's, WR's or RB's.
The Patriots do the same thing, Brady was like a 6th round pick.
Chico23231 03-31-2018, 02:29 PM Derrius Guice stands out among backs, but who do Redskins hope falls to No. 13? - Washington Redskins Blog- ESPN (http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/36144/derrius-guice-stands-out-among-backs-but-who-do-the-redskins-hope-falls-to-13)
The three names I’d watch early in the draft: Saquon Barkley, Derrius Guice and Nick Chubb. Yes, I’m well aware that Barkley should be long gone by No. 13, but if you’re asking who they like he’s at the top. He’s just unrealistic.
Others who run with some power: Michel (and he also might be better in the pass game, but I’m not convinced the Redskins like him better than Chubb); Kerryon Johnson (again, can help in the run or pass game, but still not sold on their level of interest). Rashaad Penny is another one to watch later.
30gut 03-31-2018, 06:13 PM Defense:
We play a 34 base but can't stop the run.
Targets: NT, 34 DE
In the secondary we lost Breeland and Fuller a starting CB and a starting Slot. Big holes there. Still need another S.
Targets: CB, NB
30gut 03-31-2018, 06:14 PM Targets (in no order):
CB, NB
NT, 34 DE
Outside WR (X or Z)
Interior OL
Developmental QB
Irrefutable 03-31-2018, 06:32 PM Targets (in no order):
CB, NB
NT, 34 DE
Outside WR (X or Z)
Interior OL
Developmental QB
They have 4 CB/NBs..... there are more urgent needs than drafting two, a RB and an extra OL,TE, are more important
DYoungJelly 03-31-2018, 06:55 PM Targets (in no order):
CB, NB
NT, 34 DE
Outside WR (X or Z)
Interior OL
Developmental QB What will you think if they don't draft a QB this year?
(I think they should too, without reaching)
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk
30gut 03-31-2018, 08:54 PM They have 4 CB/NBs..... there are more urgent needs than drafting two, a RB and an extra OL,TE, are more importantI'm a bit confused by what you are saying in your post.
30gut 03-31-2018, 08:55 PM What will you think if they don't draft a QB this year?
(I think they should too, without reaching)
Sent from my SM-G920V using TapatalkI think it will be a mistake.
This organization needs to always be in the process of developing QB (especially considering the rate we screw them up). I believe in the Ron Wolf philosophy: a franchise should draft a QB somewhere in every draft. QB is the most important position on the team and you never know which ones will pan out.
You can't hit on Kirk Cousins (and subsequently screw it up) unless you draft him first.
Irrefutable 03-31-2018, 09:38 PM I'm a bit confused by what you are saying in your post.
I do not think they can afford to draft both a CB and a NB, just one or the other.
I would like to see (not in this particular order) G,NT, RB, C, TE, CB, S, QB
Skinsfanatic 04-01-2018, 01:42 PM IF he is still there at 4, and IF they would take it, would you trade our first rounder this year and our first next year to the Brown's for the chance to get Barkley?
I realize there are so many reasons this will not happen, I am just curious what other people think they would do if it were a possibility.
|