mooby
12-09-2019, 05:02 PM
Trump impeachment: More than 600 law academics conclude there is 'overwhelming evidence' for president's removal
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-impeachment-more-600-law-010131675.html
His conduct is precisely the type of threat to our democracy that the founders feared when they included the remedy of impeachment in the constitution.”
The scholars said their conclusion was based on the evidence heard so far in the impeachment hearings of Mr Trump’s attempt to pressure Ukraine into investigating his political rival Joe Biden.
That includes testimony from US officials Gordon Sondland and William Taylor and Mr Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president.
The scholars said they were not giving their opinion on whether the president committed a crime.
They concluded: “Ultimately, whether to impeach the President and remove him from office depends on judgments that the Constitution leaves to Congress.
“But if the House of Representatives impeached the President for the conduct described here and the Senate voted to remove him, they would be acting well within their constitutional powers.
Let me go ahead and write your response Chico, I'd like to save you the time.
"Blah blah blah you're just mad you lost the election. It's super pathetic how you can't move on from it."
Giantone
12-09-2019, 05:05 PM
LOL, very good. Don't forget to add the obligatory "Obama this or Hillary "that.
Back2RFK
12-10-2019, 01:58 PM
Trump impeachment: More than 600 law academics conclude there is 'overwhelming evidence' for president's removal
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-impeachment-more-600-law-010131675.html
His conduct is precisely the type of threat to our democracy that the founders feared when they included the remedy of impeachment in the constitution.”
The scholars said their conclusion was based on the evidence heard so far in the impeachment hearings of Mr Trump’s attempt to pressure Ukraine into investigating his political rival Joe Biden.
That includes testimony from US officials Gordon Sondland and William Taylor and Mr Trump’s phone call with the Ukrainian president.
The scholars said they were not giving their opinion on whether the president committed a crime.
They concluded: “Ultimately, whether to impeach the President and remove him from office depends on judgments that the Constitution leaves to Congress.
“But if the House of Representatives impeached the President for the conduct described here and the Senate voted to remove him, they would be acting well within their constitutional powers.
Are these the same scholars that gave their students a safe place to cry after the election. I cannot take any of them as not bias after the reactions we saw coming out of these places. They didn't even try to hide their reaction.
Giantone
12-10-2019, 08:50 PM
Are these the same scholars that gave their students a safe place to cry after the election. I cannot take any of them as not bias after the reactions we saw coming out of these places. They didn't even try to hide their reaction.
LOL, the republican party , the party of ignorance...................Seems you have a problem if education and educators scare you.
Back2RFK
12-11-2019, 02:56 PM
LOL, the republican party , the party of ignorance...................Seems you have a problem if education and educators scare you.
I just know they are bias I'm not blind like yourself. One of them even went as low as bringing up Trumps 13 year old son.
Giantone
12-11-2019, 04:34 PM
I just know they are bias I'm not blind like yourself. One of them even went as low as bringing up Trumps 13 year old son.
I agree that was wrong I wouldn't have done it but with all the crap trump has pulled and said you have a problem with that,I find it hypocritical where was the outrage when trump made fun of a handicapped person or was grabbing women by the pussy or paying off hookers. Let's not forget it wasn't a joke she was making a point many thought was on target. trump wants to be king and president for life and has said so.
mooby
12-11-2019, 05:20 PM
I just know they are bias I'm not blind like yourself. One of them even went as low as bringing up Trumps 13 year old son.
I agree, there's no sense in bringing Barron into this. You can't pick your family, and I'm sure he's just trying to enjoy being a kid as long as he can.
With that being said, what do you think is lower? Bringing Barron Trump into a conversation he does not belong in, or cheating on your pregnant wife with a pornstar, then paying off that pornstar so she won't go public while you're trying to win an election?
Chico23231
12-11-2019, 06:08 PM
I gotta feeling Cocaine Mitch is about to pull a baller move in the Senate...per the usual
mooby
12-11-2019, 07:10 PM
I gotta feeling Cocaine Mitch is about to pull a baller move in the Senate...per the usual
Yeah me too.
Something along the lines of...
"We refuse to acknowledge any evidence whatsoever as this is a sham trial. Shut this shit down boys! The Kin... I mean POTUS is allowed to do whatever he wants as it is always in the best interest of this country"
Giantone
12-11-2019, 08:10 PM
I agree, there's no sense in bringing Barron into this. You can't pick your family, and I'm sure he's just trying to enjoy being a kid as long as he can.
With that being said, what do you think is lower? Bringing Barron Trump into a conversation he does not belong in, or cheating on your pregnant wife with a pornstar, then paying off that pornstar so she won't go public while you're trying to win an election?
Fully agree but let's be honest , no one was picking on trumps son......just the name trump gave him in pointing out trumps desire to be a king.