What has Obama done well?

Way to rep those liberals dblanch. One of lamest strings of posts I've ever read on this site. Especially the part about sexually defiling the Bible. Classy stuff.

Way to rep those liberals dblanch. One of lamest strings of posts I've ever read on this site. Especially the part about sexually defiling the Bible. Classy stuff.

Slow down son. Dblanch is an independent, don't you go labeling him!

But yeah, that was a total embarrassment...but not all that surprising coming from him. I'm sure he'll come back with some "clever" retort now.

Of course, this chain of events basically began when Miller101 decided (again) that anyone who is even remotely Republican is an idiot.

Slow down son. Dblanch is an independent, don't you go labeling him!

But yeah, that was a total embarrassment...but not all that surprising coming from him. I'm sure he'll come back with some "clever" retort now.

You all "know" me so well. :blah:

You all "know" me so well. :blah:

Maybe you could try adding something of substance to the discussion. Take a hint from saden. Instead, you throw out assumptions and then when they're refuted, you say "Oh well anyone can post a link from the Internet."

Slow down son. Dblanch is an independent, don't you go labeling him!

But yeah, that was a total embarrassment...but not all that surprising coming from him. I'm sure he'll come back with some "clever" retort now.

Of course, this chain of events basically began when Miller101 decided (again) that anyone who is even remotely Republican is an idiot.

I'm not buying that he's an independent. Some of his comments sure don't jive with that.

Such irony that Miller101 thinks anyone who even sniffs the Republican party is an idiot. I mean, reading a few of his posts pretty much contradicts that sentiment.

I'm still just amazed at a few of the things I've read in this thread this evening.

Maybe you could try adding something of substance to the discussion. Take a hint from saden. Instead, you throw out assumptions and then when they're refuted, you say "Oh well anyone can post a link from the Internet."

well then, forgive me.

You all "know" me so well. :blah:


"Your mama," "someone has their panties in a bunch," "go jerk off to the bible, Bartholomew," "poopy head."

Anything else we should know about you?

"Your mama," "someone has their panties in a bunch," "go jerk off to the bible, Bartholomew," "poopy head."

Anything else we should know about you?

oh, come on sweetie..don't be tho thentative.

I think it's time for Obama to do a housecleaning. Rahm, Axelrod, Gibbs need to go. They are not up to the job. He should bring in some steadier hands and maybe he can save his presidency. Maybe. We were told that experience and lack thereof didn't count, but it does. In a town like Washington, people who wing it, get eaten for breakfast. He's got majorities that no President has enjoyed since Johnson and he still can't move legislation. That's indicative of staff weakness. That's what de-railed Carter. Reagan got legislation passed with Tip O'Neill running congress. Of course, he had Jim Baker. Obama has Chicago people who are coming from a play to play approach where you just buy off the legislature. In D.C you can buy some but not all of the votes you need. Money is unpersuasive if people are afraid for their political lives. He needs to clean house.

Maybe you could try adding something of substance to the discussion. Take a hint from saden. Instead, you throw out assumptions and then when they're refuted, you say "Oh well anyone can post a link from the Internet."

The funny part was: "I don't post links, I READ. I don't get my news from the internet. You can pull random links to support your theory quite easily however. " ??? So, it's 2009, yet you don't read news on the internet, and those who do are somehow less informed or something?

Not sure how posting links from multiple sources proving point(s) somehow invalidates an argument. Doesn't make sense to me.