Lotus
08-23-2009, 11:39 AM
why would the league have to foot some of the cost for raising the score board? Mr. Jones was the one who put it in the way. and 2 million to him is like 2 million to Snyder, a drop in the bucket
Because the screens actually meet league regulations and have had league oversight. Some of the blame here needs to be placed on mistaken league regulations.
12thMan
08-23-2009, 11:59 AM
If Jones refuses to raise it the Cowboys should get an "unsportsman like conduct" penalty everytime a punt hits that monstrosity. The whole thing is hilarious.
tryfuhl
08-23-2009, 10:03 PM
ESPN is reporting that the screen was installed actually several yards HIGHER than what the NFL mandated.
But now the NFL is looking into it deeper. It is estimated that it would cost an additional 2 million to raise the scooreboard. And I would bet that the NFL would have to share some of the cost.
by several you mean less than 2?
tryfuhl
08-23-2009, 10:05 PM
Looking at the 'Skins offensive stats for the first 2 weeks of preseason I notice that from the 2 games played thus far, the 'Skins have had a total of 22 offensive possessions.
And of the 22 offensive possessions only 6 have crossed the 50 yard line into the oppositions side of the field.
So yeah, I can certainly see your concern for punting.
the titans' backup punter can hit it
your punter couldn't get it that high when asked to
when you guys are in a playoff game and have a chance at winning... wait, nevermind
Skinny Tee
08-23-2009, 10:31 PM
why would the league have to foot some of the cost for raising the score board? Mr. Jones was the one who put it in the way. and 2 million to him is like 2 million to Snyder, a drop in the bucket
With Jones constantly bringing up how much the stadium costs you think he'd be thrilled to throw in another 2 million dollars to the final cost tally.
Now money matters all the sudden when you bring up $2 million in REALISTIC dollars and not $1 billion imaginary ones.
Ruhskins
08-23-2009, 11:16 PM
I guess we have to wait until either New England or the Giants play there, with so much bitching and whining in their sports media, I'm sure something would be done about (see Brady rule for example).
firstdown
08-24-2009, 10:08 AM
With Jones constantly bringing up how much the stadium costs you think he'd be thrilled to throw in another 2 million dollars to the final cost tally.
Now money matters all the sudden when you bring up $2 million in REALISTIC dollars and not $1 billion imaginary ones.
It would not cost them a penny to raise the thing as it is on cables and can be raised and lowered with a push of a botton or two. I'm sure after a few times of punts hittting it they will be asked to raise it up some. It was designed for viewing at its current level and thats why they don't want to rais the thing up. As it sits now most people in the mid and upper level just look straight out and ther is the screen. People in the lower level look up some and people at the very top look down some. I actually think the thing takes away from the game and people will watch that more then they actually watch the live play on the field. It is nice to have a nice screen to watch after a play but this thing is just to dam big and anoying.
Not sure it's not easy to just push a button to raise it, unless that button push costs $2M
dmek25
08-24-2009, 10:14 AM
the screen will be raised shortly to accommodate a U2 concert. but matty is right. the cost, for some reason, is around 2 million bucks
CRedskinsRule
08-24-2009, 10:19 AM
I read that they need 6 winches the size of Humvees to move it; I was not clear whether those are still to be installed (hence the 2million) or if they were installed already and more work is needed in addition to them.