And with the 6th pick in the 2012 NFL Draft, the redskins select...........


SFREDSKIN
01-03-2012, 12:39 AM
U blame em? I think he did a while back to but still he dominates every team that has played OSU

He is a great player and I take back the character issue thing after the story with the little girl with cancer. I still want Luck!!

SBXVII
01-03-2012, 12:40 AM
What??? I can see the Browns taking RGIII (but QB isn't even in their top 3 needs) the Rams & Bucs, each of whom have drafted a 1st round QB in the past 3 years are now going to want RGIII also? If that's the case (which it won't be) that's great for us because then a young QB will be easily available for us!

Well lets just for a moment look at each...

Colts- no way they pass on Luck.

Rams- "IF" Luck was passed up they would take him. Otherwise... RGIII. I just don't think they are as satisfied with Bradford as others think, and the rumors of the Rams trading Bradford and taking RGIII does not help.

Vikes- I doubt would take another QB. I think they stick with their 2011 draft pick.

Browns- are rumored to want RGIII. Especially if he's available still.

Bucks- funny I'm also a Bucks fan and didn't know/care that they took a QB recently. Maybe cause I didn't like their HC so I didn't pay too much attention to them the last couple a years since Gruden was fired. But whoever they had just didn't stick out as a "franchise" QB to me. I could see whoever takes over wanting to get "their" QB.

Redkins- hopefully whoever is the next best QB on the list. Maybe we should take a second look at Weeden from OSU since they just beat Stanford and gave Luck a loss in the bowl game.

Can I say this Mock Draft sucks?...
2012 NFL Draft: Preliminary order set for first 20 picks - NFL - Sporting News (http://aol.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2012-01-02/2012-nfl-draft-preliminary-order-set-for-first-20-picks)

they think we need a DT yet Jarvis Jenkins will be coming back next year. WTF? How about QB, WR, FS, or OL, before we pick another DT.

CultBrennan59
01-03-2012, 12:42 AM
Shanahan mailbag: Skins need a No. 1 WR - NFC East Blog - ESPN (http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/34674/shanahan-mailbag-skins-need-a-no-1-wr)

Good read about Shanahan and what we need

SBXVII
01-03-2012, 12:51 AM
If Luck, and RGIII are off the board and whoever MS is looking at, at QB is supposed to be a 2nd round pick would you take a top WR to compliment Hankerson and pick the QB in the 2nd round?

I know we are not satisfied but lets just say the coaching staff is somewhat ok with the OL. Then the only major worries would be QB, and WR on the offensive side of the ball. I think MS is happy with Hightower, Hulu, and Royster at RB for next year. Then we have at TE Cooley (if he's able to come back), Davis, and Paulsen (not to mention Quinn and Myers). I could see another FB as depth with Young.

So if the Skins are eyeing someone who is supposed to be 2nd round material then I'd either take him anyway at #6-1st round to ensure I had him or maybe I'd take the top WR to have another weapon on offense then take a QB in the second round. or just trade back again like last year for more picks and take the QB I wanted later in the 1st round.

SBXVII
01-03-2012, 12:56 AM
OSU Weeden looked pretty good and sharp.

skinster
01-03-2012, 12:57 AM
What??? I can see the Browns taking RGIII (but QB isn't even in their top 3 needs) the Rams & Bucs, each of whom have drafted a 1st round QB in the past 3 years are now going to want RGIII also? If that's the case (which it won't be) that's great for us because then a young QB will be easily available for us!

For any team that is need of a qb, the qb is always the number 1 need.

Dirtbag59
01-03-2012, 12:58 AM
If Luck, and RGIII are off the board and whoever MS is looking at, at QB is supposed to be a 2nd round pick would you take a top WR to compliment Hankerson and pick the QB in the 2nd round?

I know we are not satisfied but lets just say the coaching staff is somewhat ok with the OL. Then the only major worries would be QB, and WR on the offensive side of the ball. I think MS is happy with Hightower, Hulu, and Royster at RB for next year. Then we have at TE Cooley (if he's able to come back), Davis, and Paulsen (not to mention Quinn and Myers). I could see another FB as depth with Young.

So if the Skins are eyeing someone who is supposed to be 2nd round material then I'd either take him anyway at #6-1st round to ensure I had him or maybe I'd take the top WR to have another weapon on offense then take a QB in the second round. or just trade back again like last year for more picks and take the QB I wanted later in the 1st round.

Hankerson, Blackmon, Davis, Cooley, Gaffney, Moss. Who ya gonna cover, who ya gonna cover?

Oh, sometimes I wish it worked like that. Would be so much easier then finding the right trigger man. Still I don't know. I still say you either go hard for RGIII or sign Flynn. Tannehill does not seem like a franchise QB.

1. Bradford
2. RGIII
3. Dalton
4. Flynn
5. Locker

12thMan
01-03-2012, 01:00 AM
My mind is made up -- I want Justin Blackmon in Burgundy and Gold. 'Nuff said.

Funny, tonight Fletcher tweeted Andrew Luck would look good in Burgundy and Gold.

WestCoastSkinsFan
01-03-2012, 01:22 AM
Call me crazy, but I think we stand at #6, and we get RG3.

The Browns do still have McCoy, and if they let Hillis walk, I think they'll be more concerned about upgrading WR or RB.

SBXVII
01-03-2012, 01:22 AM
Hankerson, Blackmon, Davis, Cooley, Gaffney, Moss. Who ya gonna cover, who ya gonna cover?

Oh, sometimes I wish it worked like that. Would be so much easier then finding the right trigger man. Still I don't know. I still say you either go hard for RGIII or sign Flynn. Tannehill does not seem like a franchise QB.

1. Bradford
2. RGIII
3. Dalton
4. Flynn
5. Locker

I'd love for us to get Luck or RGIII but I think they will already be gone and I don't subscribe to the idea of throwing our whole draft away to get either one.

I'm not sure what you numbering system was for? I'm guessing your thinking Bradford if we can trade for him, RGIII if he's available, you lost me with Dalton (Cinci ?) unless there is another Dalton declaring this year there is no way Cinci trades away Dalton. I understand you like Flynn, and Locker? So I'm confused with the numbers 3 and 5. They were just drafted last year and I would presume their teams would like to keep them and see if they become something special. Dalton will be.

Here's my plan... (JK)... the Skins trade out of the #6 pick for more picks and take a QB late in the 1st round. In the 2nd round they trade out and hopefully from the 1st round trade they get a mid 2nd and a late 2nd by trading back.... take a WR, and another QB (lol), then in the 3rd round trade one of the two 3rd rounders (our original and the second from the trade back in the 2nd round) and take a OL, and QB (lol) so see where I'm going with this.... lol. maybe if every other pick we take a QB one or two will work out and we can cut Beck and the one who sat on the PS all year for the two new guys. lol. keep trading back picking up more picks in order to off set all the QB's being taken. lol.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum