Around the NFL Off - Season style.


MTK
02-14-2013, 03:32 PM
Belichick got rid of him because he was a headcase and headhunter. We got him and he looked good in 1 Game, but he got injured so we can't be hear saying that Belichick is an idiot for giving up Meriweather when he really hasn't played

Point is Belichick isn't perfect.

skinsfaninok
02-14-2013, 03:38 PM
I'm a Brady guy but I'll say it again him and Belichick haven't won a SB since spygate

CultBrennan59
02-14-2013, 04:15 PM
I'm a Brady guy but I'll say it again him and Belichick haven't won a SB since spygate

Exactly, coincidence; No. Like Marshall Faulk said the other the patriots knew exact plays the rams were running which they had put in and practiced that week of the super bowl, in the super dome. Which is also when the guy who was videotapping was spotted by martz(?) I believe.

donofriose
02-14-2013, 05:08 PM
I'm a Brady guy but I'll say it again him and Belichick haven't won a SB since spygate

That was a random comment, I feel like the fact they cannot find replacements for Seymour, bruschi, law, mcginniest, mike v, Samuels, and Harrison has more to do with it then spygate. You have those players on one defense... That's a dynasty defense. There have been other coaches who did the same thing (Johnson in the Super Bowl against the bills) and other coaches who said it didn't make the difference between them winning Super Bowls, like cowher.

Ruhskins
02-14-2013, 05:18 PM
Can't believe people are bashing this signing...I mean it is not like we signed this guy to a big contract or anything. People just want to b*tch no matter what.

If it makes the cry babies who are complaining feel better, the Iggles also wanted to sign Brace, but he decided to come to Washington.

Skinzman
02-14-2013, 05:18 PM
That was a random comment, I feel like the fact they cannot find replacements for Seymour, bruschi, law, mcginniest, mike v, Samuels, and Harrison has more to do with it then spygate. You have those players on one defense... That's a dynasty defense. There have been other coaches who did the same thing (Johnson in the Super Bowl against the bills) and other coaches who said it didn't make the difference between them winning Super Bowls, like cowher.

Why do it if it makes no difference? And how come we always seem to hear about the winning team doing it but not the losing team?

Do you expect Cowher to say it helped him win a SB? Of course he is going to say it made no difference, except when he finds someone taping his practices...

donofriose
02-14-2013, 05:35 PM
Why do it if it makes no difference? And how come we always seem to hear about the winning team doing it but not the losing team?

Do you expect Cowher to say it helped him win a SB? Of course he is going to say it made no difference, except when he finds someone taping his practices...

Cowher said that about the patriots when they played him in the afc championship games. Because some people said the pats might have been taping them as well. And no one is going to complain about losers. People hate teams that win and want to find reasons they win. Excuses...

Skinzman
02-14-2013, 06:46 PM
Cowher said that about the patriots when they played him in the afc championship games. Because some people said the pats might have been taping them as well. And no one is going to complain about losers. People hate teams that win and want to find reasons they win. Excuses...

My bad, I didnt realize Cowher was saying that from the perspective of the team it was happening to. I thought you were saying it was a more wide spread issue other than just the Patriots. I have to admit, im surprised he said it. Im of the belief that if it doesnt help, no one will do it. If people are doing it, they believe it gives them some sort of an advantage, even if only a tiny one.

skinsfaninok
02-14-2013, 11:01 PM
Pft reporting that KC wants foles

SFREDSKIN
02-14-2013, 11:07 PM
Pft reporting that KC wants foles

Trade him for Brandon Flowers even up.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum