iamsrk
03-04-2012, 10:50 PM
The horse is dead man, just put the bat down.
Colt= Young horse. Mallet ~ Bat
was any pun intended by you there?
Colt= Young horse. Mallet ~ Bat
was any pun intended by you there?
QB Combo Possibilities: Which Do You Want (QB Rumors: Verse 10)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
[44]
45
46
47
48
49
50
iamsrk 03-04-2012, 10:50 PM The horse is dead man, just put the bat down. Colt= Young horse. Mallet ~ Bat was any pun intended by you there? EARTHQUAKE2689 03-04-2012, 10:54 PM Enough with the Colt McCoy man!!! artmonkforhallofamein07 03-04-2012, 10:56 PM Yes. But they could probably trade with us and still get Blackmon. That's why it would behoove them to eventually cave for even a cheap trade offer. If that's the case, sign PM, Garcon, and draft Blackmon. That should solve our inconsistency in the passing game. SmootSmack 03-04-2012, 11:17 PM Colt= Young horse. Mallet ~ Bat was any pun intended by you there? do you plan on telling us how/why you're coming up with your info? 44Deezel 03-04-2012, 11:23 PM I am not saying you should believe in the Shanahans. I am just saying that some team is going to find that quarterback that isn't Luck, RG3, or Peyton Manning, and it's that move that will put them in the playoff hunt. I can't look at past history and give you a compelling reason to believe that said team will be the Redskins. There's not much history that shows any person or team can consistently find diamonds in the rough at the QB position. Packers maybe? The Shannys are no different than most personnel guys in the league. They're all grasping to some extent. Hell, Bill Walsh swore Gino Carmazzi was going to carry on the Montana/Young torch for the 49ers. But I agree that chances are good that some team will hit on a QB taken after Luck and RGIII. My guess is it will be a team already somewhat set at QB that is not drafting out of desperation like the Skins. Their rookie QB will be able to sit and learn and won't be thrown into the fire like Luck and RGIII. 44Deezel 03-04-2012, 11:31 PM 2004 all over again big boy. Let's hope it's not 02,03,06 or 07 all over again! Manning bros are only QBs taken in the first 2 picks to win the Super Bowl over the last 12 years. 44Deezel 03-04-2012, 11:34 PM That was a very different beast. Draft picks weren't nearly as valued as FA and even with FA in 2004, we definitely missed on quite a few of them. Don't get me wrong, I'd love either RGIII or PM, but I'd be just as happy keeping our picks and continuing to build the franchise with younger, better players. No one is going to confuse Mark Brunell with Peyton Manning. 2004 was by far the exception, not the rule. Dirtbag59 03-04-2012, 11:44 PM Who's to say that there will be a top QB available or WORTH taking down the road? Not every draft has multiple, or even one single, franchise viable QB prospect. That is a bigger risk then "rolling the dice" on RG3. You can evaluate RG3's ability to be a franchise QB better than a sophomore or freshman QB in college currently playing. One thing I like to point out about RGIII is his ability to move in the pocket. Part of me thinks that the comparisons to Vick may have been off. Yes they have similar measureables but the playing style is completely different. Heck with the way I've seen Griffin move around the pocket he reminds me more of Rodgers then anyone else. Personally I'm just facisinated by his pocket presence. The way he moves and eludes the rush while keeping his eyes down field is exactly the type of thing a team that struggles to put lines together needs. I mean watch how often defenders close in on him and how well he moves to not only get away from them but set up the deep throws. lOKtMHJ6hIs Now compare that to Cousins and Weeden. owBOdv4BITAaUbkSR4wtWI Weeden who admitingly does a nice job against the rush but he's able to avoid sacks because of his quick release while going for the shorter quicker routes. RG3 on the other hand is eluding the rush, giving his guys time to get downfield, and then completing 20+ yard passes. SBXVII 03-05-2012, 12:09 AM I am not saying you should believe in the Shanahans. I am just saying that some team is going to find that quarterback that isn't Luck, RG3, or Peyton Manning, and it's that move that will put them in the playoff hunt. I can't look at past history and give you a compelling reason to believe that said team will be the Redskins. You Heard It Here First: Washington Redskins Can Win 2012 NFC East Title - NFL Spin Zone - A General NFL Blog providing you all the NFL News, Rumors, Updates, and National Football League News. (http://nflspinzone.com/2012/02/29/you-heard-it-here-first-washington-redskins-can-win-2012-nfc-east-title/) ^that was just for fun... But this I found interesting and have heard it more then just here. Is Ryan Tannehill a Valid Option for the Redskins? - Hogs Haven (http://www.hogshaven.com/2012/3/3/2843230/is-ryan-tannehill-a-valid-option-for-the-redskins) Dirtbag59 03-05-2012, 12:27 AM You Heard It Here First: Washington Redskins Can Win 2012 NFC East Title - NFL Spin Zone - A General NFL Blog providing you all the NFL News, Rumors, Updates, and National Football League News. (http://nflspinzone.com/2012/02/29/you-heard-it-here-first-washington-redskins-can-win-2012-nfc-east-title/) ^that was just for fun... But this I found interesting and have heard it more then just here. Is Ryan Tannehill a Valid Option for the Redskins? - Hogs Haven (http://www.hogshaven.com/2012/3/3/2843230/is-ryan-tannehill-a-valid-option-for-the-redskins) Everything I've heard about Tannehill suggest he's either going in the top 10 or the second round. There doesn't seem to be much of a middle ground in terms of projecting where he'll go. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum