offiss
09-13-2005, 03:02 AM
I alway's said if Gibbs had Marino for his first tenure here both would have at least 5 rings.
Ramsey wants to be traded (merged)Pages :
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
[26]
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
offiss 09-13-2005, 03:02 AM I alway's said if Gibbs had Marino for his first tenure here both would have at least 5 rings. Joe Knows... 09-13-2005, 03:38 AM OLD???? lol. ;) Old as in long time fan. ;) Luxorreb 09-13-2005, 04:10 AM I don't like the fact that 'Ramsey wants a trade'. I don't see this being the end of his career as a Redskin. Its a decision about wk2. I think it's an overreaction on him and his agent's part. Don't be a bitch. You're on this team and you haven't proven anything yet other than you can take some licks. Gibbs decision is about winning and ball control, no dumb penalties or stupid turnovers. Everyone makes mistakes, but Ramsey makes them more of them. He should be a man and work harder and heal his neck. I hope we haven't seen the end of his career as a Redskin and I don't believe Brunell will play every game as a starter. He needs to sit tight and realize there is a bigger picture. Remember Brady's first Superbowl win was with Drew Bledsoe on the bench. It is a long season, let's not make hasty remarks like "I want a trade". To me that's just foolish. I know everyone likes job security but I think ya gotta earn that. That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:36 AM Gibbs just won't tolerate the same stupid mistakes............. unless brunell is making them ;). That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:37 AM Ramsey replaced Brunell on week two. Or do you want to forget Ramsey's 3 INTs against the Giants. Every opportunity Ramsey has been given, he has squandered on his lonesome. He's an erratic mediocre second string QB at best. He'll never and I mean never be a top rated QB because of inconsistency. Reminds me of Chad Pennington more and more everyday. and yet he's still better than brunell. That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:40 AM SUNRA, I know that your were one of Brunell's biggest fans last year. I also recall that you were one of the last people to call for Brunell's benching and defended him basically until the week he got yanked. Is that in any way playing into your assessment of Ramsey and Brunell? he's also totally hated ramsey for a long time, so that might play into it as well ;) That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:45 AM You must admit, this is not the same Brunell from 2004. This guy was not sacked against a blitzing defense that knocked a younger guy out of the game. No INTs. No fumbles. And Portis had over 100yds. I mean this is the way its going to be in some games. he was sacked, maybe you missed it... That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:48 AM The velocity on his ball has been better than Ramsey's since preseason. How many times did Ramsey underthrow Santana Moss and every other WR in preseason? Give me something tangible that would indicate why Ramsey should be a starting QB anywhere in the NFL. More INT than TDs will not get it done. his velocity's been better? I'm sorry, but that's just wrong. I know you like brunell, if you think he's playing better or whatever that's cool, but he never threw deep in preseason, so i don't know how you can say he has more velocity... also last year, brunell had 7tds 6 ints, ramsey was 10 and 11, those ratios are NOT that different, so i'm not buying that personally. That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:50 AM 33 TD'S, 29 INTS... That's tangible to be in the NFL? Not even NFL Europe. look at bledsoe or plummer, you may not like it, but it definately is. brunell was 7 and 6 last season, so i think that arguement has no merit. That Guy 09-13-2005, 06:55 AM So Ramsey gets one, two, three, (and so on) chances but Brunell gets just one? one chance? he had 9 god awful wretched weeks last year, that's NOT one chance. |
|
EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum