Ramsey wants to be traded (merged)

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 [52] 53 54 55 56

That Guy
09-14-2005, 03:00 PM
A 65 QB rating with 4 INTs was playing well enough to start a few games?

The preseason wasn't enough for you to say he was shaky, ok that's fine I guess.

But were you there all during the offseason workouts, during minicamps and training camp?


GAMES, measure his progress in real meaningful games, not worthless fluff. Not everyone is being used, not everyone is playing hard, and the first two games were CLEARLY nothing near a real offense (testing deep passes etc).

I don't think anyone here was calling for brunell BEFORE the bears game, but it sucks that everyone's magically transformed their opinions overnight so they can continue to be gibbs apologists.

NEITHER QB has proved their worth their contracts, but this crap about how preseason means nothing goes out the window once it supports your/gibbs position?

Roth should be tossed, manning, they all sucked in preseason, bench them all. No other starters got benched after 1 int and 19 minutes this season. If you think gibbs decision is the best for the team that's fine, but i'm not buying this ramsey is horrible compared to brunell crap, they both suck equally. Ramsey just keeps defenders 10 yards farther down the field.

That Guy
09-14-2005, 03:04 PM
For all that are calling Joe "a liar", would you rather have him stick to a preseason call to name Patrick as the starter QB or win football games....call me crazy or selfish even, but I would like to start winning football games.


calling gibbs a liar and wanting to win games aren't mutually exclusive. You can say he made the move he thought he needed to to win games, but still know that he told EVERYONE every chance he got that ramsey was the starter up until 19minutes into the game. technically he never lied, but in spirit its pretty obvious what he said and what he really wanted/was going to do were very different things.

JWsleep
09-14-2005, 03:06 PM
52 pages and we haven't settled this yet??? LOL ;)

firstdown
09-14-2005, 03:09 PM
I don't know if this has been discussed but what I have read says that its a rumor that Ramsey has request to be traded. Jansen said while Ramsey is disappointed he said nothing to him about wanted to be traded and they are good friends.

offiss
09-14-2005, 03:09 PM
It's a good thing for the NFL that Favre wasen't a redskin under Gibbs, as eratic as he was early on he would be backing up in the arena league by the time Gibbs got through with him, instead of the NFL darling that he has become.

Gmanc711
09-14-2005, 03:10 PM
52 pages and we haven't settled this yet??? LOL ;)

Hopefully it will be settled very soon, with the Brunell people being right (even tho i'm a Ramsey guy). I said it before and I'll say it again tho, this place might have to shut down for a week if Brunell plays like ass on Monday.

firstdown
09-14-2005, 03:20 PM
Brunell rocked last season's preseason too, those are very special and limited circumstances. *if only* it translated 1:1 to the regular season..Rocked? Both Brunell and Ramsey sucked last year in preseason and the starting spot went to the one who sucked the lease. If I remember correctly Hasselback looked just as good as they did.

MTK
09-14-2005, 03:25 PM
This is what it all boils down to for me:

If Gibbs came out and said Ramsey is starting this week, I would have supported the decision 110%.

Instead he came out and said it's going to be Brunell, and again I support the decision 110%.

He's doing what he believes is best for the Redskins. He's not trying to win a popularity contest, he's trying to win football games.

Do I think Brunell is so much better than Ramsey at this point, no I don't. But I guess you can call me a loyal soldier. I'm falling in line and standing behind the coach. If Gibbs says we're going to battle with Brunell at the helm this week, then Brunell is my guy.

Rather than trying to swim against the tide, I'm trying to put myself in Gibbs' shoes to try to rationalize the decision. I can understand arguments from both sides, but in the end I'm going to side with the coach and trust his judgement.

offiss
09-14-2005, 03:27 PM
Rocked? Both Brunell and Ramsey sucked last year in preseason and the starting spot went to the one who sucked the lease. If I remember correctly Hasselback looked just as good as they did.


Your on the money FD, Everyone assumes because Brunell was named the starter by Gibbs after a 42 mil contract [what a surprise] that he blew Ramsey away, not the case, 1 pass play seperated the 2 of them, and that was a long TD pass from brunell to McCants, and you are right about Hasselbach except for 1 point he looked better than both of them in pre-season, wonder why HE didn't start?

illdefined
09-14-2005, 03:28 PM
Rocked? Both Brunell and Ramsey sucked last year in preseason and the starting spot went to the one who sucked the lease. If I remember correctly Hasselback looked just as good as they did.

point is Brunell was picked over Ramsey because of his offseason work. Gibbs bet on that and lost. he's doing that exact same thing again only this time with an even older, less practiced Brunell.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum