The never ending Jason Campbell player haters ball

Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 [18] 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

SirClintonPortis
09-20-2010, 07:52 PM
Hmmm, I wonder if we're going to have this problem. I mean McNabb sucks. Maybe if he was white I would give him the benefit of the doubt but only 400 passing yards. Wow, I throw for more then that on Madden.
Are NFL Head Coaches Benching Black QBs Faster Than White QBs? : Zennie Abraham : City Brights (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail?entry_id=72685)As a Chinese dude myself, I hate it when minorities try to point to "inequality of outcome" as "people are judging unequally" with annoying frequency.

First, Turd doesn't know what "confounding variable" is.
Second, turd doesn't realize that "inequality of outcome" DOES NOT MEAN "unequal judgement". If you're going to judge based on performance, and the QB's performance is sooooo goddamn awful that a change is required, IT DOESN'T MATTER if the dude white, black, etc.
Third, Mr. Abraham bunches up a bunch of white individuals into a "white establishment". Here, he shows a lack discretion when judging people.
Finally, stats are a shitty measure of capturing the moment.

pg86
09-20-2010, 09:44 PM
Doug williams book comes to mind here...Wtf where did you find that anyway

pg86
09-20-2010, 09:46 PM
And they cut poor Colt Brenan! lol

Dirtbag59
09-20-2010, 10:22 PM
Doug williams book comes to mind here...Wtf where did you find that anyway

I googled "Jason Campbell benched." The article appeared under the news results.

SirClintonPortis
09-21-2010, 12:31 AM
Cable declares a controversy-free zone - Inside the Oakland Raiders - A look inside the world of the highly classified Oakland Raiders from the writers of Bay Area News Group (http://www.ibabuzz.com/oaklandraiders/2010/09/20/cable-declares-a-controvesy-free-zone/)

He's "dead" now.

MonkFan4Life
09-21-2010, 08:57 AM
Zennie62 should read that Cable article then he might put his deck of race cards away. Use it when it makes sense, not now. This is what football is about. If you're good then you're good, if you suck you suck.


Q: Is it a setback at all in that you have Jason as the No. 1 guy since April, and then a game and a half into the season you switch gears? Or does the fact that Bruce was around last year make it easier to switch?

Cable: I think before you go into all that or read into all that, it’s about winning on Sundays. A decision was made yesterday to do that. Some of the benefits to it are the fact that Bruce has been around, yes, but if you remember, he’s had less work in the new system than Jason.


That's why he was benched, not because he was black. It's about winning, which he doesn't put them in the position to do.

MonkFan4Life
09-21-2010, 09:03 AM
Q: Should Campbell have recognized the Raiders were in the wrong formation on fourth-and-1 and called a time out?


Cable: Yeah, absolutely. In the heat of the battle, whatever it is, we didn’t get it done. I tried to fix it, but (the officials) weren’t paying attention to us.


This is what I was talking about when I bashed him. Gotta be better than that.

Hog1
09-21-2010, 09:37 AM
I imagine Zennie knows the real story as well....BUT that's not provocative or interesting............

aceinthehouse
09-21-2010, 09:53 AM
I seriously would rather have J.Russell over Campbell...
I think Campbell sucks that bad!

As bad a Russell was...and he's REAL bad...he did win games last season.

I'm not sure Campbell could win a game for Oakland...
He was losing against the Rams before being pulled and Gradowski brought the team back...lol

I'm a firm believer,the Redskins won..."in spite" of Campbell last season.
I think we had enough talent to do so...specially on the defensive side.

MTK
09-21-2010, 10:09 AM
First it was someone wanting Shuler over JC, now Russell?

C'mon people, this is just getting dumb :doh:

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum