Redskins, Cowboys could go “nuclear” over cap mess


GTripp0012
03-17-2012, 10:02 PM
My guess after the Grossman deal is somewhere around $5.5 million in cap space.

That's smaller than the rookie pool will be. So even still needing to create space for Fletcher, we're on dollars borrowed from future seasons at this point.

skinster
03-17-2012, 10:07 PM
I want everything, draft picks, cap space...everything

SirClintonPortis
03-17-2012, 10:13 PM
worse yet, where are all those o-linemen we need? We're being shut out there.

On the roster.

Counter-Tre
03-17-2012, 11:17 PM
In the words of good ol stone cold.. Oh hell yea

Atogwe over Meriwheather who couldn't stop a nyg wr for nothinhttp://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g15/Turd_Cutter/stalefacejpg.gif

Counter-Tre
03-17-2012, 11:26 PM
The league should really play ball because the more this issue is examined, the more ridiculous they look. They sprang this punishment on the eve of free agency. They said the teams could spread the punishment over the next two years however they like and then reversed themselves and said at least half of the punishment had to be taken this season. They punished two teams for front loading contracts yet no punishment for the Bears who gave Julius Peppers a $20M base salary in 2010, dropping to $900k base salary in 2011. They didn't punish teams like the Bucs who exploited the absence of a minimum spending cap. Bottom line, they did not mete out punishments equally, they made the rules up as they went along, and waited two years to dole out "justice" on contracts the league approved!

los panda
03-18-2012, 12:29 AM
The league should really play ball because the more this issue is examined, the more ridiculous they look. They sprang this punishment on the eve of free agency. They said the teams could spread the punishment over the next two years however they like and then reversed themselves and said at least half of the punishment had to be taken this season. They punished two teams for front loading contracts yet no punishment for the Bears who gave Julius Peppers a $20M base salary in 2010, dropping to $900k base salary in 2011. They didn't punish teams like the Bucs who exploited the absence of a minimum spending cap. Bottom line, they did not mete out punishments equally, they made the rules up as they went along, and waited two years to dole out "justice" on contracts the league approved!amen

That Guy
03-18-2012, 12:35 AM
start throwing grenades. it's crap and i doubt it will stand as long as they show they're willing to fight it at any cost.

FRPLG
03-18-2012, 12:48 AM
Here's the main issue with all of this (among many very salient and relevant issues that all equal total crap):

The whole situation shows how the the NFL's owners operate as a cartel. Play by their rules or they'll put you down. There really is no denying it. There is no obvious legal justification for their actions, and there's even less justification from a fairness standpoint. But that isn't the point. If you think the repercussions of not following their illegal collusive activity were bad just wait until a lawsuit is filed from within their own that threatens their beloved antitrust exemption. I am not sure we can conceive of the reaction to that. Our "nuclear" option might dwarfed by theirs.

skinster
03-18-2012, 01:12 AM
My guess after the Grossman deal is somewhere around $5.5 million in cap space.

That's smaller than the rookie pool will be. So even still needing to create space for Fletcher, we're on dollars borrowed from future seasons at this point.

Doubt Rexs contact is anywhere near that. Last year he was the starter and signed for the vet min. Now he's a backup. Not gonna be over 2.5 mil, but I'd guess its under 2 mil.

SirClintonPortis
03-18-2012, 01:17 AM
Doubt Rexs contact is anywhere near that. Last year he was the starter and signed for the vet min. Now he's a backup. Not gonna be over 2.5 mil, but I'd guess its under 2 mil.

Probably less than TJax's hit for sure.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum