Update: McCain Selects Gov. Sarah Palin as Running Mate


onlydarksets
09-09-2008, 02:45 PM
I would completely disagree. I agree the far right influence has been a disaster for the Repubs but I think the far lefts influence is so ingrained and institutionalized that it no longer even appears as influence. It actually is the party. It has been going on since the 60's. The Repubs are catching up quick though.

The 25% of this country that would identify themselves as democrats but not in the context of their super liberal party get left out in the cold the same way the 25% of Repubs do.

Our country seems to align basically like this.

15 25 20 25 15

left to right.

the problem in both parties is that the 15 percenters run the show.

the 25 percenters are stuck voting for blobs like Kerry/GW because they can't support someone so opposed to their fundamental beliefs.

and the middle 20 percenters vote the guy they like the best regardless of politics.

we need to bust up the two party system something fierce. it is killing us.

Great post. There is so much blind party loyalty due to the lack of viable alternatives.

redsk1
09-09-2008, 02:57 PM
It's hard to imagine anyone doing a shittier job than W, who is perhaps the worst President ever.

That's a pretty harsh statement.

The opinion polls are just that, opinion and emotion. Nobody wants to be over in IRAQ and that's a big part of it. I'm sure GW himself would rather not be there, but you can't just pack up and leave. The Dems even know that..most of them.

You can't pin the economy on GW even though most person will. Just like you can't give too much credit to the Clinton Adminstration for the sucesses of the 90's. It relies too much on the past.

Someone asked what was one of his successes. How about America not being attacked in the last 7 years?

Look, i don't like everything GW has done, but he not as evil as some portray him to be.

saden1
09-09-2008, 03:05 PM
He may not be evil but he sure is stupid though not stupid enough not get elected as president twice.

onlydarksets
09-09-2008, 03:07 PM
No, but the majority of people agreed to go to war, then pulled the rug out from under him. You also can't blame the rising gas prices solely on him, and those are the two major things people would point to for approval ratings.

Agreed to go to war in Afghanistan, not Iraq. There was a lot of smoke and mirrors that got us into Iraq. Whether we should pull out right now is a completely separate question.

Also, the people would point to the deficit, yet everyone was more than happy to spend their refund check. So, no, I would not count any of those against his tenure.
That is a complete non sequitur. He increased spending dramatically, and the deficit is at record levels - there really isn't a credible argument against the deficit being his doing.

Approval ratings mean nothing, and you know it. It's like Polls, they are useless.
I agree, although they are slightly "less bad".

MTK
09-09-2008, 03:21 PM
He may not be evil but he sure is stupid though not stupid enough not get elected as president twice.

The term "Elected" should be used loosely, at least in 2000.

MTK
09-09-2008, 03:23 PM
That's a pretty harsh statement.

The opinion polls are just that, opinion and emotion. Nobody wants to be over in IRAQ and that's a big part of it. I'm sure GW himself would rather not be there, but you can't just pack up and leave. The Dems even know that..most of them.

You can't pin the economy on GW even though most person will. Just like you can't give too much credit to the Clinton Adminstration for the sucesses of the 90's. It relies too much on the past.

Someone asked what was one of his successes. How about America not being attacked in the last 7 years?

Look, i don't like everything GW has done, but he not as evil as some portray him to be.

Harsh perhaps... but tell me he's not at least in the discussion when talking about some of the worst Presidents we've seen.

onlydarksets
09-09-2008, 03:28 PM
OK, back to topic (sort of). Did anyone hear this "voicemail" left by McCain for Palin? Whichever side of the aisle you are on, this is good stuff:
McCain's Voicemail to Palin Leaked to Press (Listen) - 236 - The Room (http://www.236.com/blog/w/lee_camp/mccains_voice_mail_to_palin_le_8644.php)

mredskins
09-09-2008, 04:14 PM
OK, back to topic (sort of). Did anyone hear this "voicemail" left by McCain for Palin? Whichever side of the aisle you are on, this is good stuff:
McCain's Voicemail to Palin Leaked to Press (Listen) - 236 - The Room (http://www.236.com/blog/w/lee_camp/mccains_voice_mail_to_palin_le_8644.php)


That was well done and funny!

JoeRedskin
09-09-2008, 04:29 PM
Harsh perhaps... but tell me he's not at least in the discussion when talking about some of the worst Presidents we've seen.

Actually, that would be pretty interesting: "Rate the Presidents You Could've Voted For"

Reagan
Bush I
Clinton
Bush II

Though I couldn't vote for him, I would put Carter and Bush II about even.

My bet is that, depending on your leanings, Reagan or Clinton would be at the top.

(Does this count as a threadjack? Can this thread even be threadjacked at this point??)

SmootSmack
09-09-2008, 04:42 PM
Actually, that would be pretty interesting: "Rate the Presidents You Could've Voted For"

Reagan
Bush I
Clinton
Bush II

Though I couldn't vote for him, I would put Carter and Bush II about even.

My bet is that, depending on your leanings, Reagan or Clinton would be at the top.

(Does this count as a threadjack? Can this thread even be threadjacked at this point??)

Could be a good thread. But we'd have to draw the line somewhere. I mean Curmudgeon goes back to the Hoover administration.

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum