Warpath's Official Man Law Thread


TheMalcolmConnection
06-15-2006, 09:58 AM
HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway.

12thMan
06-15-2006, 10:00 AM
HAHA! Graphic. I also propose that man law states that you NEVER, under ANY circumstances, share one "end" of a girl. Personally, I'm almost for never joining a buddy on a girl anyway.

But you know what, that type of shit usually isn't planned it just sort goes down, if you know what I mean!!!

TheMalcolmConnection
06-15-2006, 10:02 AM
HAHA! So true indeed. I remember waking up at a party one night with my buddy slamming some chick right next to me and she's like "Wanna' join us?"

TheMalcolmConnection
06-15-2006, 10:02 AM
I was taken at the time so I was a good boyfriend, but yes, that kind of thing just happens.

JoeRedskin
06-15-2006, 10:08 AM
I've been reading the "bros before hoes" manlaw thread and its various caveats, addendums, and escape clauses.

Pardon me while I puke.

The law is the law. It says what it says. The beauty of it is that it IS open to interpretation. Is my wife a hoe? nope. Does she trump bros in all places and all times 'cause she's not a hoe? nope. If I'm single, am I pulling a bros before hoes if a hot chick makes an incredible offer in the middle of a bro planned event? maybe, maybe not. We'll all find out later when I report back to the bros. If I have to buy them all beers for a week and put up with shit for a month, then yes. If they are buying me beers and giving me serious man-worship for my score, then no. If (as BSB has said) you are cutting yourself off from your bros for a brand new hoe - most probly you are in violation. BUT, if its the once in a lifetime "Damn, this is right" woman, than no - and when you resurface in a few weeks with her, your bros will both celebrate your happiness while they rib you to pieces about how you now a member of the "captured class".

Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond.

TheMalcolmConnection
06-15-2006, 10:16 AM
That's a very interesting way to look at it. If your bros are bros at all, they won't give you shit. It's all about the ying and yang, the alpha and the omega. The circle of life.

http://people.freenet.de/fullen/lionking/lion15.gif

12thMan
06-15-2006, 10:18 AM
Bros before hoes - means be true to your buds, but it also means that your buds will be true to you. No amount of addendums, escape clauses or other scrivener bullsh** can more fully describe that duty or that bond.

Hmm....this sounds like the closest thing to the man law. Let's vote.

TheMalcolmConnection
06-15-2006, 10:21 AM
I say Man Law should be simply as JoeRedskin stated: Be true to your buds and they will be true to you.

Do good things and good things happen.

http://www.quidsweb.com/images/mynameisearl.jpg

TheMalcolmConnection
06-15-2006, 10:22 AM
The official statement of "Bros before Hoes" is too wide-open and not easily interpreted.

12thMan
06-15-2006, 10:23 AM
I was taken at the time so I was a good boyfriend, but yes, that kind of thing just happens.

Dude, you're a better dog...I mean man than I am!

EZ Archive Ads Plugin for vBulletin Copyright 2006 Computer Help Forum