When is Enough ,Enough?

lol...13-15 years old got taught a lesson about what? They didn't do anything wrong...and whats beautiful is the full video shows what happened and then the apologies started to roll out from the media. The media used and abused children to fuel a false narrative which is primarily revolves around their hatred of the president.

And now they will pay...CNN, NBC parent and Washington Post are all facing about a billion in 3 lawsuits from this one. Its certainly justified.

I see you didn't answer my question about the chaperones,so in your opinion the kids /group did nothing to aggravate or agitate the situation, they did not contribute to their situation at all?

I see you didn't answer my question about the chaperones,so in your opinion the kids /group did nothing to aggravate or agitate the situation, they did not contribute to their situation at all?

who cares about chaperones...the media didn't care, they made the kids the enemy.

You are victim blaming 13-15 year old kids? The full video clearly states they did nothing. The lying Indian initiated the encounter and you need to watch and hear the other group that was there...you dont remember that or you are ignoring it.

https://i.redd.it/ihi3ghzxdq631.png

Man I tell ya, it's gonna be hard to vote for a sleazy, lyin', high tax, low energy, corrupt, radical socialist, low IQ, MS-13 loving Democrat next year but I think I'm gonna do it.

https://i.redd.it/ihi3ghzxdq631.png

Man I tell ya, it's gonna be hard to vote for a sleazy, lyin', high tax, low energy, corrupt, radical socialist, low IQ, MS-13 loving Democrat next year but I think I'm gonna do it.

Amen!

This F'ing guy

Trump mistakenly claims Revolutionary War soldiers 'took over airports' in 'Salute to America' speech (https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/451725-trump-mistakingly-claims-revolutionary-war-soldiers-seized-airports)

It's some else's fault,with trump it always is.

It's some else's fault,with trump it always is.



He blamed the teleprompter actually. The same teleprompter he repeatedly berated Obama for using. What an idiot. [emoji3575]

We bullshit a lot on here but I would really love it if everyone, haters and Trumpers alike, would read this article and give me a solid, multi-sentence (looking at you Chico) opinion on it. Especially if that can be done without "Trump is mentally incompetent, and so are his supporters" or "just another MSM fake news piece by someone who is blinded by their hatred of Trump."

The question of why Trump is scandal-proof has perplexed me since he started running for President. This article is the closest thing I've read to actually getting some analysis as to why this phenomenon is unique to him.

I think we can all agree that any number of Trump's scandals would have destroyed any other candidate, and yet he still emerges through the inevitable next one.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201812/complete-psychological-analysis-trumps-support?fbclid=IwAR2hC7J502WFVTmzPGQjs2x4z3fLXIOoC sjIz3Vs1fsFScw4dwnWbu3Nu88

We bullshit a lot on here but I would really love it if everyone, haters and Trumpers alike, would read this article and give me a solid, multi-sentence (looking at you Chico) opinion on it. Especially if that can be done without "Trump is mentally incompetent, and so are his supporters" or "just another MSM fake news piece by someone who is blinded by their hatred of Trump."



The question of why Trump is scandal-proof has perplexed me since he started running for President. This article is the closest thing I've read to actually getting some analysis as to why this phenomenon is unique to him.



I think we can all agree that any number of Trump's scandals would have destroyed any other candidate, and yet he still emerges through the inevitable next one.



https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/mind-in-the-machine/201812/complete-psychological-analysis-trumps-support?fbclid=IwAR2hC7J502WFVTmzPGQjs2x4z3fLXIOoC sjIz3Vs1fsFScw4dwnWbu3Nu88I read the article at a glance, and I am sure some of the analysis is reasonable and sound, but I also think it is not as complicated or incomprehensible as the writer makes it seem. Many presidents are able to "do no wrong" with their supporters. Reagan was known as the Teflon president, Bill Clinton was Bill Clinton and could get by with a hearty laugh and a big aw shucks. I don't think it is really that unusual for Presidents to be untouchable, in fact even Nixon won reelection in a landslide at one point.

Basically people want to believe in their elected officials, and forgive all sorts of crap on both sides of the aisle. Look at Robert Byrd he was a flat out racist democrat that held office till he was over 90, or Ted Kennedy consorted with the russians in the middle of the cold war to get Reagan out, but he was a hero to the democrats. It is really only a modern trend that people on both sides of the spectrum actually hold SOME politicians accountable, and even then it almost has to be a smoking gun laced with sexual immorality and/or racial affronts for fairly minor politicians to be disgraced out of office.

I honestly think people like G1 are far more fascinating in that Trump could bring about world peace, offer free healthcare to all, and ensure social security would never fail, and G1/many others would still hate his guts.

Mind you I am not saying he has done any of that and his style is extremely grating to everybody so I get when people who disagree with policy issues attack him incessantly, the republican core did that with Obama as well, even when he had good ideas or policies.

Finally, in this day and age, AND as this forum has repeatedly demonstrated, if you want to find a reason to support or hate trump there is a link for that.



Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

I read the article at a glance, and I am sure some of the analysis is reasonable and sound, but I also think it is not as complicated or incomprehensible as the writer makes it seem. Many presidents are able to "do no wrong" with their supporters. Reagan was known as the Teflon president, Bill Clinton was Bill Clinton and could get by with a hearty laugh and a big aw shucks. I don't think it is really that unusual for Presidents to be untouchable, in fact even Nixon won reelection in a landslide at one point.

Basically people want to believe in their elected officials, and forgive all sorts of crap on both sides of the aisle. Look at Robert Byrd he was a flat out racist democrat that held office till he was over 90, or Ted Kennedy consorted with the russians in the middle of the cold war to get Reagan out, but he was a hero to the democrats. It is really only a modern trend that people on both sides of the spectrum actually hold SOME politicians accountable, and even then it almost has to be a smoking gun laced with sexual immorality and/or racial affronts for fairly minor politicians to be disgraced out of office.

I honestly think people like G1 are far more fascinating in that Trump could bring about world peace, offer free healthcare to all, and ensure social security would never fail, and G1/many others would still hate his guts.

Mind you I am not saying he has done any of that and his style is extremely grating to everybody so I get when people who disagree with policy issues attack him incessantly, the republican core did that with Obama as well, even when he had good ideas or policies.

Finally, in this day and age, AND as this forum has repeatedly demonstrated, if you want to find a reason to support or hate trump there is a link for that.


Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

Your bias is showing you Trump cult member.