When is Enough ,Enough?

.........what boy?


Your post's of recent have me thinking you might have this...................



The Eddie Haskell Syndrome | The wonderful world of Captain Snark (http://captainsnark.freeforums.net/thread/18/eddie-haskell-syndrome)

G1 it was a joke man. Lawd! Light hearted..dude chill.

U wouldn’t call bigly?

Speaking of disgusting...............


https://thinkprogress.org/trump-justin-anthony-kennedy-deutsche-bank-scotus-4ba95e7ce0be/

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.

G1 it was a joke man. Lawd! Light hearted..dude chill.

U wouldn’t call bigly?

.............who use's the word "dude" anymore???

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.

Yes more conspiracy theories. I’m sure it’s true.

Mitch told your party, obama, and you the voter you would live to regret this and you would regret it sooner than you think.

Your party should have never change the rules.

Dems need to own it now. And they need to explain it to you and all the Democratic voters...they owe you that. Unless somehow you agreed with basic stupidity of the move. The question now is, why the hell is the same democrats in power of the party?

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.
Yup and the trumplings will march right along with it as long as it takes down the country the trump cult is happy.

I saw that too. Personally, I have no idea if this is some quid-pro-quo deal or not but if it is I hope Mueller's investigation wraps it up before the next Justice is confirmed. I fully expect it to be in line with Trump's nominating the worst possible guy/gal for critical positions. Still, even if there are too many "incidental" coincidences I don't expect anything to come of it. We are looking at a conservative SC for the next 30-40 years imo.Yup and the trumplings will march right along with it as long as it takes down the country the trump cult is happy.Ok. I have read that article several times and still cannot make the conspiracy connection that you two seem to see.

If i understand right Kennedy's son would be in a huge position to damage Trump due to his work at DB on Trump's dealings. And clearly if Kennedy's son had knowledge of damaging evidence I think it is reasonable to think he would let his father know not to Trust Trump. If Kennedy was told by his son not to trust Trump, I doubt Kennedy would resign, instead staying on the bench adjudicate any Mueller rulings. I guess maybe you could see him stepping down so he would not have to recuse himself thus opening Mueller rulings subject to a potential 4-4 tie. But retiring and allowing Trump to select his successor seems like a draconian way to avoid that outcome.

G1, progressives and socialists are the ones leading this country down a fate like the old USSR and every other economy that has taken up socialism as their banner.

Ok. I have read that article several times and still cannot make the conspiracy connection that you two seem to see.

If i understand right Kennedy's son would be in a huge position to damage Trump due to his work at DB on Trump's dealings. And clearly if Kennedy's son had knowledge of damaging evidence I think it is reasonable to think he would let his father know not to Trust Trump. If Kennedy was told by his son not to trust Trump, I doubt Kennedy would resign, instead staying on the bench adjudicate any Mueller rulings. I guess maybe you could see him stepping down so he would not have to recuse himself thus opening Mueller rulings subject to a potential 4-4 tie. But retiring and allowing Trump to select his successor seems like a draconian way to avoid that outcome.

G1, progressives and socialists are the ones leading this country down a fate like the old USSR and every other economy that has taken up socialism as their banner.

.........like I said the cult is happy, fuck the country.

Fairly dismissive comment. Not very useful in a forum about discussions.

But to try a civil response.

I like the general direction of the country under trump. I wish that there was a less abrasive social environment, but in a free speech democracy you should not want or expect group think.
I wish that, rather then each side demonizing and ascribing bad intent to the other, that both sides would look for the rational parts of the other sides positions and work toward a solution that satisfies the substantial majority(70-80%). There are some people on both sides that cant easily be satisfied, and there are some on both sides that should NOT be accomodated, but everyone should have the right to openly discuss their strongly held beliefs. Discussion does not mean physical violence and those on either side who bring violence into civil discourse should be arrested. .........like I said the cult is happy, fuck the country.

Fairly dismissive comment. Not very useful in a forum about discussions.

But to try a civil response.

I like the general direction of the country under trump. I wish that there was a less abrasive social environment, but in a free speech democracy you should not want or expect group think.
I wish that, rather then each side demonizing and ascribing bad intent to the other, that both sides would look for the rational parts of the other sides positions and work toward a solution that satisfies the substantial majority(70-80%). There are some people on both sides that cant easily be satisfied, and there are some on both sides that should NOT be accomodated, but everyone should have the right to openly discuss their strongly held beliefs. Discussion does not mean physical violence and those on either side who bring violence into civil discourse should be arrested.

LOL, civil ? You're the one talking "violence".Trump campaigned on violence and now the right is not taking the credit for what they started,Do we really need to post the trump campaign video's again tell the crowed he would pay they legal bills for beating the crap out of protesters???Or the video's of his hate on the "FREE PRESS" or maybe his hate on Hillary and a GOLD STAR FAMILY? . You want the left to do what the right won't do and you're
upset becuase they won't ,you're a hypocrite.

Ok. I have read that article several times and still cannot make the conspiracy connection that you two seem to see.



G1, progressives and socialists are the ones leading this country down a fate like the old USSR and every other economy that has taken up socialism as their banner.



Right , not the president/dictator who is single handedly bringing fascism to the United States. I find funny your complaint about the "old USSR" considering who elected trump.I thought the trumplings love putin.