When is Enough ,Enough?

Using children as pawns in political battles should not unite us. Demonizing one side or the other should not unite us. Saying one side hates children should not unite us.

If you show me that these kids safety was endangered, yes I agree, and any DHS personnel who hurt or abuse kids should be fired. BUT, not having every amenity a US citizen might have, isn't the same as having abusing or endangering children. Unlike what the lying media has put out there, these aren't concentration camps, these are centers that must abide by US regulations and safety laws. I would be willing to lay a wager that most of these children have better hygiene standards and water and toilet facilities then the lands they left.

I just spent three days up at the New Jersey shore and they were talking about the fact the the Federal goverment lied,they thought they had about 19 kids ,the number was 329 and growing .All ready talk of little kids being attacked by older ones inside these detention centers,so you can blow that better hygiene crap out the window, you're saying it's okay for teenagers to abuse little kids as long as there is a clean toilet???



https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/20/politics/new-york-mayor-blasts-trump/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/21/us/undocumented-migrant-children-detention-facilities-abuse-invs/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2018/06/18/colleen-kraft-american-academy-of-pediatrics-family-separation-child-abuse-ath.cnn

Do you still have to pay to get on the beach at jersey shore?

Do you still have to pay to get on the beach at jersey shore?

Yes, at most of them.It pays for the Lifeguards ,extra Police,Insurance and care of the beach.

George Will has had enough

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f0e413daf0ad

George Will has had enough

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/vote-against-the-gop-this-november/2018/06/22/a6378306-7575-11e8-b4b7-308400242c2e_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.f0e413daf0adThat is what i have been saying. Will faults the republicans in Congress - and rightly so. He also faults the democrats in Congress when it was a democratic president.

Congressional Republicans (congressional Democrats are equally supine toward Democratic presidents) have no higher ambition than to placate this president. By leaving dormant the powers inherent in their institution, they vitiate the Constitution’s vital principle: the separation of powers.

Congress has lost the capacity for proper congressional oversight and a deliberative legislative process. There is no greater evidence for a need for term limits then the last 20 years of congressional negligence.

That is what i have been saying. Will faults the republicans in Congress - and rightly so. He also faults the democrats in Congress when it was a democratic president.



Congress has lost the capacity for proper congressional oversight and a deliberative legislative process. There is no greater evidence for a need for term limits then the last 20 years of congressional negligence.

I agree.

I have never disagreed with that.

If Chico and Punch chime in that they agree we may be in store for a VERY long cold streak. Lol

If Chico and Punch chime in that they agree we may be in store for a VERY long cold streak. Lol

BE STILL MY HEART!!!:food-smil

This is wrong. I didn't mind this guy he had a history of ruling on the side of Law and I have no problem with that but this is .............



https://thinkprogress.org/gorsuch-says-hell-repeal-and-replace-the-fourth-amendment-with-something-terrific-9238f5568313/

As a presidential candidate, Donald Trump offered a vague promise to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act with “something terrific.” On Friday, Neil Gorsuch, who occupies the seat on the Supreme Court that Senate Republicans held open until Trump could fill it, brought a similar amount of thoughtfulness and coherence to the question of when police should be allowed to conduct a search without a warrant.

Gorsuch’s dissenting opinion in Carpenter v. United States is an odd piece of writing. It reads less like a judicial opinion and more like the sort of essay that an overworked law professor might toss off after they suddenly realize that they have a symposium paper due at the end of the week. After lecturing his colleagues for 20 pages about how he has uncovered a way of interpreting the Fourth Amendment that is more “tied to the law” than the last half-century of Supreme Court opinions on this subject, Gorsuch outright refuses to apply this mysterious new interpretation to the case at hand.