When is Enough ,Enough?

Hint, not your job. There are signs, if they are being violated you call a Policeman.My wife is one that use's those parking spots and we run into that shit all the time can't think of one time where it was worth pulling a gun out and killing someone .

The guys first instinct was coming out and seeing someone in a confrontation with his wife and he intervened , see no reason for a gun to be drawn the video is clear.

If your wife doing it with other spots available, then that’s bullshit. Inconsiderate.

Not a physical confrontation...if you see someone arguing then you think ok to put hands on someone? To get physical? No sorry, your breaking the law then and should be arrested.

Hint, not your job. There are signs, if they are being violated you call a Policeman.My wife is one that use's those parking spots and we run into that shit all the time can't think of one time where it was worth pulling a gun out and killing someone .

The guys first instinct was coming out and seeing someone in a confrontation with his wife and he intervened , see no reason for a gun to be drawn the video is clear.The guy saw someone parking in the handicap spot and first instinct was to correct them versus calling the police (which we all know would not have resulted in any thing)

The guy came out and first instinct was to attack the guy arguing with his wife

The guy was attacked and first instinct was to defend himself with deadly force.

I have found the culprit

Its this g**d*** guy called first instinct

If your wife doing it with other spots available, then that’s bullshit. Inconsiderate.

Not a physical confrontation...if you see someone arguing then you think ok to put hands on someone? To get physical? No sorry, your breaking the law then and should be arrested.
My wife is handicapped she use those spots we have the tags and placards ,you're practicing the jump the gun media you hate so much chico.

The guy saw someone parking in the handicap spot and first instinct was to correct them versus calling the police (which we all know would not have resulted in any thing)

The guy came out and first instinct was to attack the guy arguing with his wife

The guy was attacked and first instinct was to defend himself with deadly force.

I have found the culprit

Its this g**d*** guy called first instinct

The first instinct was to protect his wife

The guy had no ,none ,justification to open up with deadly fire.

The cult will defend the crazy till the end.

For two such astute people you sure seem to miss alot on that video , like the couple going into the store obviously noticing the man over at the parked car and most likely btelling someone in the store there was an "altercation going on outside" and yes a good 4-5 seconds goes by between the push and the shooting I see you also miss the fact the man who did the pushing was backing up when shot.

https://nypost.com/2018/07/20/stand-your-ground-law-protects-shooter-in-deadly-fight-over-parking-space-sheriff/

My wife is handicapped she use those spots we have the tags and placards ,you're practicing the jump the gun media you hate so much chico.

Oh well ha, that’s a big difference. Fuck people using them...that’s what I’m saying.

If your wife doing it with other spots available, then that’s bullshit. Inconsiderate.
.

:stop:

The first instinct was to protect his wife

The guy had no ,none ,justification to open up with deadly fire.

The cult will defend the crazy till the end.

G1, do you realize we all are basically in agreement that the shooter was in the wrong?

I said he's likely to lose any wrongful death lawsuit. Chico said the law needs to change. Do you just want to argue for argument sake?

G1, do you realize we all are basically in agreement that the shooter was in the wrong?

I said he's likely to lose any wrongful death lawsuit. Chico said the law needs to change. Do you just want to argue for argument sake?

LOL, no you're not. Your spin is admitting the shooter was wrong and then immediately blame the dead guy. Even when the two of you are in agreement with someone it has to be on your terms.

G1, do you realize we all are basically in agreement that the shooter was in the wrong?

I said he's likely to lose any wrongful death lawsuit. Chico said the law needs to change. Do you just want to argue for argument sake?

G1 is thinking a lot of how I see most people express opinions today...its like binary code 0 and 1...black and white, true and false, ying and yang, good and bad, like and dislike, thumbs up and thumbs down

Most want to be one way or the other and more important, they want consistency. That way its less thinking involved...social media has really made this worse.

Yes you can support the NRA and support forms of gun control, Yes you can be pro-immigration and support building a wall to secure a border, Yes you can be pro-environment issues and support deregulation of silly energy policy etc.